2013
DOI: 10.1920/re.ifs.2013.0088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal sustainability of an independent Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyse sensitivity to population projections we compare main results with simulations based on the low migration variant of the 2010-based ONS population projections. These are the same projections that were used by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in their recent report on the fiscal sustainability of an independent Scotland (Amior et al ., 2013) and by Crawford and Tetlow (2014). Figure 8 shows OADR for both regions for 2010-based low migration projections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyse sensitivity to population projections we compare main results with simulations based on the low migration variant of the 2010-based ONS population projections. These are the same projections that were used by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in their recent report on the fiscal sustainability of an independent Scotland (Amior et al ., 2013) and by Crawford and Tetlow (2014). Figure 8 shows OADR for both regions for 2010-based low migration projections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to compare the results presented in this paper with the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) report on the fiscal sustainability of an independent Scotland (Amior et al, 2013) and Crawford and Tetlow (2014) because they address some of the same issues. Our conclusions differ somewhat for a number of reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The intrinsically reassuring nature of OBR forecasts is, therefore, another example of the basic point this article seeks to make. The relevance to the Scottish referendum is that two influential London-based think tanks -the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) -have both taken the OBR' s central forecast for the UK as a starting point, and they then disaggregated this forecast to give a consistent forecast for Scotland 3,4 . They then looked at the implications of these "Scottish" forecasts for various aspects of Scotland' s demography and public finances.…”
Section: The Office For Budget Responsibility: Forecasting and Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implication of this is that fiscal action taken in the medium term could make a significant difference to the projected outlook for borrowing and debt illustrated in Figures 6.7 and 6.8. Amior, Crawford and Tetlow (2013) discusses in more detail the scale of fiscal tightening that would be required to put the Scottish public finances on a sustainable footing for the next 50 years.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuller discussion of the outlook for the Scottish public finances, illustrating the sensitivity of the projections described in Section 6.2 to these assumptions, is contained in Amior, Crawford and Tetlow (2013). …”
Section: Alternative Modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%