2015
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20121236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal Volatility Shocks and Economic Activity

Abstract: We study how Policymakers and business leaders alike saw the US economy between 2008 and 2014 as being buffeted by larger-than-usual uncertainty about fiscal policy. As illustrated by a number of prolonged struggles at all levels of government, there 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
428
2
17

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 713 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
21
428
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, these two episodes cannot be fully explained by low-frequency movements of productivity growth only. Our finding therefore also contributes to the recent evidence on the macroeconomic effects of measures of volatility and uncertainty (see Bloom, 2009;Baker, Bloom, & Davis, 2012;Fernandez-Villaverde et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Indeed, these two episodes cannot be fully explained by low-frequency movements of productivity growth only. Our finding therefore also contributes to the recent evidence on the macroeconomic effects of measures of volatility and uncertainty (see Bloom, 2009;Baker, Bloom, & Davis, 2012;Fernandez-Villaverde et al, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Fernández‐Villaverde et al. () find that uncertainty about fiscal policy, as measured by time‐varying volatility of tax and spending processes, has negative effects on economic activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, while the fiscal cliff uncertainty shock developed in this paper affects both first and second moments, as highlighted in Figure , the fiscal volatility shocks in Fernández‐Villaverde et al. () affect only the second moments. Fernández‐Villaverde et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Fernández‐Villaverde et al. () find vector autoregression (VAR) evidence that a two standard deviation shock to the volatility in capital taxes lowers output around 0.3%, while consumption falls to a lower extent and investment falls more significantly. These are slightly smaller estimates than the fiscal noise case shown in Figure , but follow a similar pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%