2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish environmental DNA is more concentrated in aquatic sediments than surface water

Abstract: a b s t r a c tGenetic identification of aqueous environmental DNA (eDNA) provides site occupancy inferences for rare aquatic macrofauna that are often easier to obtain than direct observations of organisms. This relative ease makes eDNA sampling a valuable tool for conservation biology. Research on the origin, state, transport, and fate of eDNA shed by aquatic macrofauna is needed to describe the spatiotemporal context for eDNA-based occupancy inferences and to guide eDNA sampling design. We tested the hypoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
471
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(491 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
17
471
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Vertical transport (i.e. settling) of fish eDNA and accumulation in pond and river sediments was recently described by Turner et al (2015). The high concentrations of sedimentary fish eDNA they observed also suggest that resuspension of settled eDNA represents an important element of eDNA ecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vertical transport (i.e. settling) of fish eDNA and accumulation in pond and river sediments was recently described by Turner et al (2015). The high concentrations of sedimentary fish eDNA they observed also suggest that resuspension of settled eDNA represents an important element of eDNA ecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Much of this work has focused on aquatic habitats in laboratory (Dejean et al 2011;Thomsen et al 2012b;Goldberg et al 2013;Barnes et al 2014;Strickler et al 2015), while several studies have occurred in aquatic field settings (Thomsen et al 2012a;Merkes et al 2014). Turner et al 2015 presented one of the first comparisons of accumulation of eDNA in open-water versus aquatic sediment samples. Fewer studies have examined eDNA persistence in terrestrial environments (Andersen et al 2012).…”
Section: Fate: What Factors Influence Edna Persistence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of chloroplast DNA copies results mainly from the number of chloroplasts per cell and the number of chloroplast genomes per chloroplast, which vary across diatom taxa (Bedoshvili et al 2009). Other aspects regarding taphonomy are the preservation potential of DNA Pedersen et al 2015) versus diatom valves (Ryves et al 2006) and the different representations of DNA versus valves in the various lake habitats, for example caused by different transport characteristics and adsorption of DNA to sediments (Torti et al 2015;Turner et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Strickler et al 26 investigated the effects of temperature, pH and UVB radiation on eDNA in water and found that it degraded faster in warmer water, with a neutral pH and a moderate UVB level. Because these conditions are also amenable to microbial growth, the authors speculated that eDNA breakdown was at least partially facilitated by microbial action.…”
Section: Edna In Aquatic Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 However, the fact that DNA may be concentrated and survive much longer in sediments may be a complicating factor. 25 DNA dispersal in flowing streams and rivers is also a concern, as it may give false positive results downstream where the organism in question is not found. DNA dispersal was investigated by Laramie et al 28 who traced eDNA of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), and Deiner et al 29 who studied eDNA of a daphnid (Daphnia longispina) and swollen river mussel (Unio tumidus).…”
Section: Edna In Aquatic Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%