2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-014-0328-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish fins and scales as non-lethally sampled tissues for stable isotope analysis in five fish species of north – eastern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, C. sordidus had a positive slope in the muscle – δ 15 N relationship, and a negative slope for the blood – δ 15 N relationship, resulting in this being the only species that displayed an effect of TL on Δ δ N. This species also showed a significant difference in feeding between smaller IP and larger TP individuals (Plass‐Johnson et al., ). These results confirm the suggestion that conversion factors are species‐specific (Matich et al., ; Willis et al., ; Cano‐Rocabayera et al., ), even with closely related species (in our case two Chlorurus species) having different conversion factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, C. sordidus had a positive slope in the muscle – δ 15 N relationship, and a negative slope for the blood – δ 15 N relationship, resulting in this being the only species that displayed an effect of TL on Δ δ N. This species also showed a significant difference in feeding between smaller IP and larger TP individuals (Plass‐Johnson et al., ). These results confirm the suggestion that conversion factors are species‐specific (Matich et al., ; Willis et al., ; Cano‐Rocabayera et al., ), even with closely related species (in our case two Chlorurus species) having different conversion factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Much work has gone into understanding alternative methods of isotopic sampling in teleost fishes (e.g. Matich et al., ; Willis et al., ; Cano‐Rocabayera et al., ), and the implication of our findings is that sampling of parrotfish blood for isotopic analysis could be an alternative to the highly destructive dorsal or caudal muscle sampling. Although extraction of blood from the caudal vein does not eliminate the chance of mortality, it clearly is potentially less destructive than sampling muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The rationale is that a consumer incorporates the isotopic composition of its prey in a predictive way in relation to an ecosystem baseline (Jardine et al, 2003). However, growing evidence indicates that isotopic assimilation (discrimination factors) can vary between species and their tissues (Bond and Diamond, 2011;Cano-Rocabayera et al, 2015). Since such knowledge is still very limited for many species in European Mediterranean rivers, these tracers should only be used after an accurate calculation of discrimination factors and a solid ecological knowledge of the target species (Bond and Diamond, 2011).…”
Section: Indicators Of Energy Metabolism and Trophic Tracersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lethal sampling is, however, not desirable, particularly when studying highly threatened fish species or where anaesthesia may reduce the ability of the animal to recover. Several recent studies have used non‐lethal sampling approaches, including the sampling of mucus, scales, blood, and fin, as alternatives to white muscle. For most fish species, fin tissue has been found to be the most isotopically similar to muscle tissue, making fins viable alternatives to muscle tissue .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%