Fish Habitat Degradation in U.S. Reservoirs

Abstract

As the median age of the thousands of large reservoirs (> 200 ha) in the United States tops 50, many are showing various signs of fish habitat degradation. Our goal was to identify major factors degrading fish habitat in reservoirs across the country, and to explore regional degradation patterns. An online survey including 14 metrics was scored on a 0 (no degradation) to 5 (high degradation) point scale by 221 fisheries scientists (92% response rate) to describe degradation in 482 reservoirs randomly distributed throughout the continental United States. The highest scored sources of degradation were lack of aquatic macrophytes (41% of the reservoirs scored as 4–5), lack or loss of woody debris (35% scored 4–5), mistimed water level fluctuations (34% scored 4–5), and sedimentation (31% scored 4–5). Factor analysis identified five primary degradation factors that accounted for most of the variability in the 14 degradation metrics. The factors reflected siltation, structural habitat, eutrophication, water regime, and aquatic plants. Three degradation factors were driven principally by in‐reservoir processes, whereas the other two were driven by inputs from the watershed. A comparison across U.S. regions indicated significant geographical differences in degradation relative to the factors emphasized by each region. Reservoirs sometimes have been dismissed as unnatural and disruptive, but they are a product of public policy, a critical feature of landscapes, and they cannot be overlooked if managers are to effectively conserve river systems. Protection and restoration of reservoir habitats may be enhanced with a broader perspective that includes watershed management, in addition to in reservoir activities.

Lakeshore and littoral physical habitat structure in a national lakes assessment

“…Snag cover is recognized as a particularly important element of littoral habitat complexity (Christensen et al 1996, Francis and Schindler 2006, Miranda et al 2010); therefore, we included snags as a separate…”

The role of submerged trees in structuring fish assemblages in reservoirs: two case studies in South America

“…However, some studies have evaluated the role of fallen trunks and the impact of their removal on the biota of a given area and have also highlighted the role of submerged trunks in creating structure within habitats (Sass et al, 2006;Roth et al, 2007, Helmus & Sass, 2008Ahrenstorff et al, 2009). An extensive study by Miranda et al (2010), conducted in almost 500 North American reservoirs, revealed that the scarcity or the absence of macrophytes and submerged trunks is the main factor to be considered for the restoration of fish habitat in these environments.…”

Ecological impacts of winter water level drawdowns on lake littoral zones: a review

“…Declines in fish diet, growth rate, biomass, and abundance correlate with reduced littoral physical habitat complexity (Bettoli et al 1993;Sass et al 2006). Anthropogenic regulation of water level regimes is a primary threat to fish species that use the littoral zone for all or part of their lives (Winfield 2004;Miranda et al 2010;Strayer and Findlay 2010). Annual winter drawdowns can reduce the availability and suitability of spawning habitat, limit the availability of winter habitat refuge from lethal DO concentrations (Cott et al 2008) and predation, decrease and alter food supplies, and alter the levels of predator-prey and competitive interactions via macrophyte structural and taxonomical composition alteration and density reduction (Wilcox and Meeker 1992).…”