Fish Morphology and Hierarchy. Parts II and III

Matsubara, K.

doi:10.2307/1440449

Cited by 66 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(1975Masuda et a!. ( , 1980, Matsubara (1955), Miura et a!. (1973), Okada (1955), Schmidt (1930Schmidt ( , 1931, Shiogaki & Dotsu (1973), Shiogaki et a!.…”

Section: Study Area Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Annotated List of Blenniid Fishes from Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan

Fukao¹

1985

Publ. SMBL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(1975Masuda et a!. ( , 1980, Matsubara (1955), Miura et a!. (1973), Okada (1955), Schmidt (1930Schmidt ( , 1931, Shiogaki & Dotsu (1973), Shiogaki et a!.…”

Section: Study Area Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Annotated List of Blenniid Fishes from Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan

Fukao¹

1985

Publ. SMBL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Hoplichthys regani is also reported from Sombrero Island (apparently a misspelling of Scobrero Island), Balayan Bay and Verde Island (Matsubara 1955a), and the South China Sea (McGrouther 2000), with only the scientific name in a key to species. Matsubara (1955a) did not provide the catalog numbers of specimens or a detailed description.…”

Section: Clearly Indicated That the New Scientific Namementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Matsubara (1955a) did not provide the catalog numbers of specimens or a detailed description. Other records listed in the synonymy were not represented by specimens from specific localities, were without descriptions, were based on the holotype, or were probably misidentifications.…”

Section: Clearly Indicated That the New Scientific Namementioning

confidence: 99%

Taxonomic status of Hoplichthys regani Jordan 1908 (Scorpaeniformes: Hoplichthyidae), with comments on its authorship

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3 (description, southern Japan and East China Sea); Matsubara, 1955: 1122 (key, short description and distribution, Tokyo Bay, south from Kasumi, Hyogo Prefecture, Korea and East China Sea); Anonymous, 1962: 926, fig. 730 (description, Hainan Island, South China Sea); Ochiai, 1984: 322, pl. 289-E (short description and distribution, southern Japan to East China Sea); Yatou, 1985: 599, 729, pl.…”

Section: Ratabulus Megacephalusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Taxonomic revision of the genus Ratabulus (Teleostei: Platycephalidae), with descriptions of two new species from Australia

Imamura

Gomon²

2010

MMV

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gomon, M.F. and Imamura, H. 2010. Taxonomic revision of the genus Ratabulus (Teleostei: Platycephalidae), with descriptions of two new species from Australia. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 67: 19-33.The platycephlid genus Ratabulus Jordan and Hubbs, 1925 is reviewed taxonomically. The genus is defined by the long, slender canines on its upper jaw, palatine and vomer, the presence of a small free spine between the two dorsal fins, the iris lappet broad and simple dorsally, the suborbital ridge with numerous spines, the suborbitals and preopercle lacking sensory tubes in the cheek region, and lateral line scales with only a single pore posteriorly. Although the genus has been regarded as comprising only a single species, Ratabulus diversidens (McCulloch, 1914), this study presents descriptions of four: R. megacephalus (Tanaka, 1917) in southern Japan to the South China Sea, R. diversidens in eastern Australia, R. fulviguttatus sp. nov. in northwestern Australia and R. ventralis sp. nov. in northeastern Australia. R. megacephalus, having been regarded as a junior synonym of R. diversidens, is easily separable from that species in having more anteroventrally slanted oblique scale rows above the lateral line (94-112 versus 80-93). R. fulviguttatus sp. nov. is similar to R. megacephalus in having small dark spots dorsally on the body, but differs from it in having a shorter snout (30.4-34.8% HL versus 31.2-35.7% HL), longer pelvic fin (20.9-25.7% SL versus 19.5-23.1% SL), and a pale brown head and body (versus dark brown). Although R. ventralis sp. nov. resembles R. diversidens in having the nasal bone with tubercles, the former is distinguished from the latter and R. megacephalus by its longer pectoral fin (15.8-18.6% SL versus 13.9-17.0% SL). R. diversidens also differs from its three congeners in having larger brownish spots on the pelvic fin.

show abstract

Fish Morphology and Hierarchy. Parts II and III

Cited by 66 publications

References 0 publications

An Annotated List of Blenniid Fishes from Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan

An Annotated List of Blenniid Fishes from Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan

Taxonomic status of Hoplichthys regani Jordan 1908 (Scorpaeniformes: Hoplichthyidae), with comments on its authorship

Taxonomic revision of the genus Ratabulus (Teleostei: Platycephalidae), with descriptions of two new species from Australia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About