2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish otolith mass asymmetry: morphometry and influence on acoustic functionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
101
3
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
101
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate the mechanics of CO 2 -altered otoliths, we applied the size and relative density data from sagittal otoliths in our experiment to a mathematical model of otolith motion in response to an 0.8-nm amplitude sinusoidal acoustic wave (27,28). Our simulation demonstrated that when subjected to the same sound stimulus, the estimated CO 2 -driven increase in relative otolith mass results in an increased displacement amplitude compared with control otoliths (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To simulate the mechanics of CO 2 -altered otoliths, we applied the size and relative density data from sagittal otoliths in our experiment to a mathematical model of otolith motion in response to an 0.8-nm amplitude sinusoidal acoustic wave (27,28). Our simulation demonstrated that when subjected to the same sound stimulus, the estimated CO 2 -driven increase in relative otolith mass results in an increased displacement amplitude compared with control otoliths (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alteration of otolith size, density, and mass has direct impacts on otolith mechanics and influences sensory function (27)(28)(29). To simulate the mechanics of CO 2 -altered otoliths, we applied the size and relative density data from sagittal otoliths in our experiment to a mathematical model of otolith motion in response to an 0.8-nm amplitude sinusoidal acoustic wave (27,28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Breuker & Brakefield 2002;Bergstrom & Reimchen 2003;Cornelissen & Stiling 2005), few studies have examined the potential functional costs of asymmetry and whether asymmetry influences dispersal and recruitment processes (but see Matessi 1997;Breuker et al 2007). Previous studies on asymmetry within fishes indicate that bilateral differences in otolith mass can trigger abnormal swimming behaviour ('motion sickness'; Helling et al 2003) and interfere with correct sound localization (Lychakov & Rebane 2005), reducing an individual's ability to interact with its environment by compromising its performance. If variations in otolith size and shape do have a major bearing on an individual's ability to effectively detect sound (Popper & Lu 2000), what the present finding suggests is that asymmetrical otoliths may have a direct effect on the ability of P. amboinensis larvae to detect optimal reef habitats during the critical settlement phase of their lives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inter-saccular analyses; Edds-Walton & Fay 2002), and morphological differences between the right and left paired saccular otoliths can pose problems for sound localization due to incongruity in the movement of the right and left otolith within the saccule (cf. Lychakov & Rebane 2005). Hence, even a small degree of asymmetry in the shape of the otolith pair can cause significant differences in the acoustic functionality of young fishes, thereby potentially jeopardizing the successful recruitment of larvae to suitable benthic habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%