2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish predation on sympatric and allopatric prey—A case study of Ponto-Caspian gobies, European bullhead and amphipods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower consumption of D. villosus compared to Gammarus roeselii by the turbot (Lota lota) was also observed by . A similar result was shown by Błońska et al (2015) villosus determined its survival under the pressure of these predator species (Błońska et al, 2016). The coarse and complex substratum (gravel, stones and zebra mussel colonies) also improved the survival of D. villosus compared to fine substrata and other gammarid species (Kinzler & Maier, 2006;Kobak, Jermacz & Płąchocki, 2014).…”
Section: Dikerogammarus Villosus As Preysupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lower consumption of D. villosus compared to Gammarus roeselii by the turbot (Lota lota) was also observed by . A similar result was shown by Błońska et al (2015) villosus determined its survival under the pressure of these predator species (Błońska et al, 2016). The coarse and complex substratum (gravel, stones and zebra mussel colonies) also improved the survival of D. villosus compared to fine substrata and other gammarid species (Kinzler & Maier, 2006;Kobak, Jermacz & Płąchocki, 2014).…”
Section: Dikerogammarus Villosus As Preysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Under experimental conditions, D. villosus, exhibited higher survival than other gammarids, including both native and invasive species, in the presence of diverse predators, such as the sympatric Ponto-Caspian gobies or the allopatric European bullhead and Amur sleeper Błońska et al, 2015;Błońska et al, 2016). The lower consumption of D. villosus compared to Gammarus roeselii by the turbot (Lota lota) was also observed by .…”
Section: Dikerogammarus Villosus As Preymentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some differences between the test species were noted, for example the reduction in TBARS of D. villosus occurred independently of the type of predation risk (constant vs. periodic), whereas G. jazdzewskii showed such a response only when periodically stimulated by the predator cue. Dikerogammarus villosus exhibits one of the highest survival rates among gammarids when experimentally exposed to predators, indicating the effectiveness of its anti-predator defences [43][44][45] . Compared to G. jazdzewskii, D. villosus is more armoured, less active, efficiently uses hard substrata as shelters and is able to form aggregations efficiently reducing predation risk 44,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, its physiological response is not as pronounced as that exhibited by species relying on their inducible defence mechanisms. On the other hand, G. jazdzewskii exposed to predation in a limited space has been experimentally demonstrated to have a lower survival rate than other gammarids, even in sheltered conditions (Kobak et al 2014;Błońska et al 2015Błońska et al , 2016Schmidt-Drewello et al 2016). Therefore, to reduce predation risk in natural conditions, G. jazdzewskii has to relocate immediately after the detection of a predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%