Biological Research in Aquatic Science 2019
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish Sperm Physiology: Structure, Factors Regulating Motility, and Motility Evaluation

Abstract: For reproduction, most fish species adopt external fertilization: their spermatozoa are delivered in the external milieu (marine-or freshwater) that represents both a drastic environment and a source of signals that control the motility function. This chapter is an updated overview of the signaling pathways going from external signals such as osmolarity and ionic concentration and their membrane reception to their transduction through the membrane and their final reception at the flagellar axoneme level. Addit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In mammals, Ca 2+ ‐independent flagellar dynein and ATP orchestrate the low‐amplitude sinusoidal‐activated motility of the tail, but hyperactivated motility requires Ca 2+ to enter the sperm through specific channels, such as Catsper, as part of the capacitation process (Qi et al., 2007). Activation of sperm motility in teleost fish also requires Ca 2+ influx (Cosson, 2019), but because teleost fish lack Catsper channels, Ca 2+ signalling must involve a different process to those of marine invertebrates and mammals (Fechner et al., 2015). In fish, sperm flagella are able to respond to regulation by free calcium concentration by altering their beating pattern (Cosson, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In mammals, Ca 2+ ‐independent flagellar dynein and ATP orchestrate the low‐amplitude sinusoidal‐activated motility of the tail, but hyperactivated motility requires Ca 2+ to enter the sperm through specific channels, such as Catsper, as part of the capacitation process (Qi et al., 2007). Activation of sperm motility in teleost fish also requires Ca 2+ influx (Cosson, 2019), but because teleost fish lack Catsper channels, Ca 2+ signalling must involve a different process to those of marine invertebrates and mammals (Fechner et al., 2015). In fish, sperm flagella are able to respond to regulation by free calcium concentration by altering their beating pattern (Cosson, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of sperm motility in teleost fish also requires Ca 2+ influx (Cosson, 2019), but because teleost fish lack Catsper channels, Ca 2+ signalling must involve a different process to those of marine invertebrates and mammals (Fechner et al., 2015). In fish, sperm flagella are able to respond to regulation by free calcium concentration by altering their beating pattern (Cosson, 2019). However, another potential mechanism may lie in the regulation of the focal adhesion complex, that both alpha actinin and filamin contribute to, which is important for capacitation and thus hyperactivation of mammalian sperm (Roa‐Espitia et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to cortisol, anesthetics may also interfere with this parameter, since direct contact between MS-222 and sperm decreased the sperm motility time of O. mykiss [28]. In the present study, sperm motility presented a negative linear response, suggesting that stress-related hormones have induced osmoregulatory dysfunctions [38] causing blood plasma dilution and alteration in seminal plasma osmolarity [37], causing pre-activation of spermatozoa and, consequently, decreased sperm motility [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, few normal cells were observed after vitrification (only when ACP-104 was used), with normal free head and strongly coiled tail being the most common abnormalities. An increase in sperm pathology can reduce cell motility (Cosson, Billard, Cibert, Dréanno, & Suquet, 1999), which may explain that the highest motility rates observed were 22.73 ± 0.73% and 27.94 ± 1.01%, when 5%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%