2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2016/07/073103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisher–Hartwig determinants, conformal field theory and universality in generalised XX models

Abstract: We discuss certain quadratic models of spinless fermions on a 1D lattice, and their corresponding spin chains. These were studied by Keating and Mezzadri in the context of their relation to the Haar measures of the classical compact groups. We show how these models correspond to translation invariant models on an infinite or semi-infinite chain, which in the simplest case reduce to the familiar XX model. We give physical context to mathematical results for the entanglement entropy, and calculate the spin-spin … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, observe that the charge-two operator e i(θ 1 (x)+θ 2 (x)) with ∆ = 1/2 dominates the charge-two operator e i(2θ 1 (x)+ϕ 2 (x)) with ∆ = 5/4 (and indeed the charge-two operator e i2θ 1 (x) with ∆ = 1). Then, as argued in [53], in isotropic models σ + = O 1 + iO −1 will be dominated by operators τ µ,ν with j µ j + ν j = 1 (charge condition) and |µ i − ν j | ≤ 1 (dominance condition). These conditions give a sum of terms that are products of e ±iθ or e ±i(ϕ+k j x) in each sector, and hence that can be distinguished by the presence or absence of oscillatory factors e ±ik j x .…”
Section: 44mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, observe that the charge-two operator e i(θ 1 (x)+θ 2 (x)) with ∆ = 1/2 dominates the charge-two operator e i(2θ 1 (x)+ϕ 2 (x)) with ∆ = 5/4 (and indeed the charge-two operator e i2θ 1 (x) with ∆ = 1). Then, as argued in [53], in isotropic models σ + = O 1 + iO −1 will be dominated by operators τ µ,ν with j µ j + ν j = 1 (charge condition) and |µ i − ν j | ≤ 1 (dominance condition). These conditions give a sum of terms that are products of e ±iθ or e ±i(ϕ+k j x) in each sector, and hence that can be distinguished by the presence or absence of oscillatory factors e ±ik j x .…”
Section: 44mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This relation implies that ω = −c. The correlators O α (1)O α (N + 1) with |α| ≤ 1 in isotropic models with general c and ω = −c were derived in references [52,53] using the same methods as this paper. Our results go further by studying a wider class of models, including critical phases with general (c, ω), as well as a wider class of observables: O α (1)O α (N + 1) for all α.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These zeros are 'removable'-for further discussion see Refs. [41,42,49]. 2 In the case N = 1 we will also use the notation kF for the Fermi momentum.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For N > 1, we have a low-energy CFT description only when each of the v j are equal: an SO(2N ) 1 Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) model with c = N [36]. For general velocities, the case N > 1 can still be understood using CFT concepts: the scaling law (1) holds with c = N [37] and one can identify low-energy descriptions of lattice operators by taking sums and products of CFT operators from each of the different sectors [38][39][40][41][42] (each sector being a copy of the c = 1 CFT). Moreover, we give an explicit argument that for a family of N = 2 Hamiltonians that are not described at low energies by a CFT (since they have different Fermi velocities), the ground state has a parent Hamiltonian that is described at low energies by a CFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%