2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2022.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisher's disjunction as the principle vindicating p-values, confidence intervals, and their generalizations: A frequentist semantics for possibility theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different rationales for the next equation may be found in coherence axioms (Bickel & Patriota, 2019) and in an argument building on Fisher's disjunction (Bickel, 2023). The compatibility of the hypothesis that θ$$ \theta $$ is in $$ \mathscr{H} $$ with the data is the C ‐value italicC()=supθ0italicp()θ0,$$ C\left(\mathscr{H}\right)={\sup}_{\theta_0\in \mathscr{H}}p\left({\theta}_0\right), $$ which, in the above cases, is italicC(){}θitalicH0=italicp()θitalicH0$$ C\left(\left\{{\theta}_{H_0}\right\}\right)=p\left({\theta}_{H_0}\right) $$, meaning the compatibility of the hypothesis that θ=θitalicH0$$ \theta ={\theta}_{H_0} $$ with the data is equal to the p ‐value testing that simple hypothesis. italicC()true{}θitalicH0=supθ0θitalicH0italicp()θ0=italicp(trueθ^)=1$$ C\left(\overline{\left\{{\theta}_{H_0}\right\}}\right)={\sup}_{\theta_0\ne {\theta}_{H_0}}p\left({\theta}_0\right)=p\left(\hat{\theta}\right)=1 $$, meaning the compatibility of the hypothesis that θθitalicH0$$ \theta \ne {\theta}_{H_0} $$ with the data is equal to 100%. …”
Section: Is There Enough Evidence To Accept the Alternative Hypothesis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different rationales for the next equation may be found in coherence axioms (Bickel & Patriota, 2019) and in an argument building on Fisher's disjunction (Bickel, 2023). The compatibility of the hypothesis that θ$$ \theta $$ is in $$ \mathscr{H} $$ with the data is the C ‐value italicC()=supθ0italicp()θ0,$$ C\left(\mathscr{H}\right)={\sup}_{\theta_0\in \mathscr{H}}p\left({\theta}_0\right), $$ which, in the above cases, is italicC(){}θitalicH0=italicp()θitalicH0$$ C\left(\left\{{\theta}_{H_0}\right\}\right)=p\left({\theta}_{H_0}\right) $$, meaning the compatibility of the hypothesis that θ=θitalicH0$$ \theta ={\theta}_{H_0} $$ with the data is equal to the p ‐value testing that simple hypothesis. italicC()true{}θitalicH0=supθ0θitalicH0italicp()θ0=italicp(trueθ^)=1$$ C\left(\overline{\left\{{\theta}_{H_0}\right\}}\right)={\sup}_{\theta_0\ne {\theta}_{H_0}}p\left({\theta}_0\right)=p\left(\hat{\theta}\right)=1 $$, meaning the compatibility of the hypothesis that θθitalicH0$$ \theta \ne {\theta}_{H_0} $$ with the data is equal to 100%. …”
Section: Is There Enough Evidence To Accept the Alternative Hypothesis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restricted parameter problems, such as those with a bounded parameter of interest and those with a finite parameter space, motivated defining normalC()false|$$ \mathrm{C}\left(\mathscr{H}|\mathcal{R}\right) $$, the conditional C ‐value given that the parameter of interest is restricted to $$ \mathcal{R} $$, a subset of normalΘ$$ \Theta $$ (Bickel & Patriota, 2019). Recent applications of the conditional C ‐value include interpreting initial studies in light of replication studies, modifying p ‐values for prior information, and comparing a finite number of scientific hypotheses (Bickel, 2023). The C ‐value has much in common with the measure of evidence introduced by Patriota (2013), which was recently applied to mixed models (Patriota & de Oliveira Alves, 2022).…”
Section: Is There Enough Evidence To Accept the Alternative Hypothesis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation