2007
DOI: 10.1002/9781118688038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
561
0
104

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 625 publications
(671 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
561
0
104
Order By: Relevance
“…Ergene (1998) and İkiz et al (1998) report higher values for the condition coefficient (1.47-1.61 and 1.121-1.667 respectively), while Balık (1980) and Topkara and Balık (2004) mention almost similar with the present study values (1.142-1.315 and 1.315-1.481, respectively). Variation in the condition factor of fish may be indicative of food abundance, adaptation to the environment and gonadal development (King 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergene (1998) and İkiz et al (1998) report higher values for the condition coefficient (1.47-1.61 and 1.121-1.667 respectively), while Balık (1980) and Topkara and Balık (2004) mention almost similar with the present study values (1.142-1.315 and 1.315-1.481, respectively). Variation in the condition factor of fish may be indicative of food abundance, adaptation to the environment and gonadal development (King 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A logistic regression curve was fitted to the data to estimate length at 50% maturity (L 50 ) by the use of a non-linear least-squares procedure weighted by the number of fish in each length-class. The form of regression equation used was (King 1995): [-r(L -Lm)] ) -1 where: P m is the percentage of mature individuals, r is the slope of the curve or rate of increase in maturity, L m is length at 50% maturity, and L is the 5 cm length class. Probit analysis was performed using computer based 'R' software to estimate L 50 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ova diameter was measured under microscope using the Swift cam software, with a view to understand the monthly occurrence of mature ovaries. Size at first maturity was estimated following King (1996) for pooled data as there was no clear difference in the size between male and female). Length-weight relationship was derived as in Le Cren (1951).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%