2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisheries bycatch reduction within the least-cost biodiversity mitigation hierarchy: Conservatory offsets with an application to sea turtles

Abstract: This paper considers fisheries bycatch reduction within the least-cost biodiversity impact mitigation hierarchy. It introduces conservatory offsets that are implemented earlier in the biodiversity impact mitigation hierarchy than conventional compensatory offsets used as instruments of last resort. The paper illustrates implementation in an on-going sea turtle conservation programme by the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weighting values used in this study were supported by specialized literature and expert knowledge, but one of the advantages of the conceptual framework and the approach used in this analysis is that the user can adjust and define the values that they consider most appropriate, enabling the evaluation of different weighting scenarios for the variables. However, in terms of the potential impacts of the 6 threats evaluated here, sea turtle bycatch (with its origin in fishing effort and inappropriate fishing practices) is considered one of the greatest threats to these species worldwide (Lewison et al 2014, Squires et al 2018, so it is not unusual that the specialists scored this as the top threat.…”
Section: Spatially Explicit Ecological Vulnerability Of Sea Turtlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighting values used in this study were supported by specialized literature and expert knowledge, but one of the advantages of the conceptual framework and the approach used in this analysis is that the user can adjust and define the values that they consider most appropriate, enabling the evaluation of different weighting scenarios for the variables. However, in terms of the potential impacts of the 6 threats evaluated here, sea turtle bycatch (with its origin in fishing effort and inappropriate fishing practices) is considered one of the greatest threats to these species worldwide (Lewison et al 2014, Squires et al 2018, so it is not unusual that the specialists scored this as the top threat.…”
Section: Spatially Explicit Ecological Vulnerability Of Sea Turtlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From pollution to illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, to habitat alteration and loss, bycatch, climate change, and recently Covid-19, the negative impacts are common and extensive. There have also been many successes in the marine realm (e.g., bycatch reduction; Squires et al 2018 ; Komoroske and Lewison 2015 ), though there is insufficient space to explore all of these topics in detail here. Notably, however, we are now beginning to realize that these (and other issues) are also problematic in inland waters (Reid et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can then allow for identification of least-cost conservation measures, which minimize elasmobranch mortality while maximizing opportunity costs to fishers (Squires et al, 2018). Third, continued and expanded collection of species-specific catch and trade data should be carried out, allowing for management measures to become more refined as more data becomes available, and assessments of the ecological and social impacts of management measures, to inform adaptive management.…”
Section: Future Directions For Research and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%