Hakes 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118568262.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisheries, ecology and markets of South African hake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of adult M. paradoxus, response curves and graphs depicting the relative importance of various factors in defining the sizes of distribution areas (Figures 2, 5 and 9) do not indicate any particular temperature or oxygen niche, except that temperature is important in defining large areas of adult distribution (Figure 8), which is already well known (e.g. Durholtz et al 2015). Such broad ranges of occurrence justify consideration of other sources of variability as potentially being more critical than temperature and oxygen in determining where adult M. paradoxus occur.…”
Section: Biological Interpretation Of the Environmental Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the case of adult M. paradoxus, response curves and graphs depicting the relative importance of various factors in defining the sizes of distribution areas (Figures 2, 5 and 9) do not indicate any particular temperature or oxygen niche, except that temperature is important in defining large areas of adult distribution (Figure 8), which is already well known (e.g. Durholtz et al 2015). Such broad ranges of occurrence justify consideration of other sources of variability as potentially being more critical than temperature and oxygen in determining where adult M. paradoxus occur.…”
Section: Biological Interpretation Of the Environmental Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, between À80 and À350 m, there is a permanent cold-water body located at 28°S (in the region of the Orange River mouth), which disappears with depth (Shillington et al 2004). As M. paradoxus distribution ranges from À110 to À1000 m, and M. capensis is commonly found between À30 and À500 m (Durholtz et al 2015), the species should broadly be exposed to different environmental conditions across the system and throughout their life cycle. A similar pattern was observed in two co-occurring demersal fishes from the genus Coryphaenoides, where the abyssal species did not show signs of genetic differentiation across a thermal front, while the 'shallower' species had two populations on either side of the barrier (White et al 2011).…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Substructuring Across A Depth Gradient mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cape hakes (Merluccius paradoxus and M. capensis) are offshore, demersal species co-occurring from southern Angola to southern South Africa (Botha 1985). Distribution and abundance varies between taxa, with adult M. paradoxus considered a slope species, occurring mainly in deeper waters (200-800 m), and M. capensis considered a shelf species, with higher abundance at shallower depths (100-300 m; Payne & Punt 1995;Durholtz et al 2015). Therefore, the distribution of the two species is thought to be associated with local bathymetry and continental shelf width, with both moving to deeper waters as they mature (Jansen et al 2015;Stromme et al 2015;Wilhelm et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that M. paradoxus spawns in both Namibian and South African waters, while M. capensis spawns only in South African waters (Burmeister, 2005; Kainge et al 2007). Furthermore, M. capensis show morphological variation (colour of the anal fin and iris) between these two regions (Durholtz et al 2014). Yet, recent genetic analyses (von der Heyden et al 2007, 2010) have not successfully clarified the current perceptions of stock structure of these fishes by showing no differences in mitochondrial DNA between M. capensis from Namibia and South Africa, but showing significant genetic differentiation between adult M. paradoxus from these two regions.…”
Section: Southern Africa (Angola Namibia South Africa Mozambique mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, recent genetic analyses (von der Heyden et al 2007, 2010) have not successfully clarified the current perceptions of stock structure of these fishes by showing no differences in mitochondrial DNA between M. capensis from Namibia and South Africa, but showing significant genetic differentiation between adult M. paradoxus from these two regions. Currently both species are managed separately in South Africa and Namibia (Durholtz et al 2014), but were it the case that the M. paradoxus population is shared between these countries, serious re-evaluation of management strategies should be considered.…”
Section: Southern Africa (Angola Namibia South Africa Mozambique mentioning
confidence: 99%