2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40152-018-0123-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishers’ knowledge and scientific indeterminacy: contested oil impacts in Mexico’s sacrifice zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…FEK proved to be useful for management, research and detection of long-term changes in fish stocks. The decline in stocks was attributed to greenhouse emissions, pollution, dredging, and industrial fisheries, reflecting other findings around the world (Ambrose et al, 2014;Sievanen, 2014;Saavedra Díaz et al 2015a, b;Lima et al, 2016; Anbleyth-Evans, 2018;Quist, 2019). In addition, SSF already possess tools that could enhance conservation, such as species-specific gears based on knowledge of the environment and species behaviour, as reported for other developing regions in the world (López Cazorla, 2004;Sievanen, 2014;García-Quijano & Valdés-Pizzini, 2015).…”
Section: Fek In the Bbe As A Conservation Toolsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…FEK proved to be useful for management, research and detection of long-term changes in fish stocks. The decline in stocks was attributed to greenhouse emissions, pollution, dredging, and industrial fisheries, reflecting other findings around the world (Ambrose et al, 2014;Sievanen, 2014;Saavedra Díaz et al 2015a, b;Lima et al, 2016; Anbleyth-Evans, 2018;Quist, 2019). In addition, SSF already possess tools that could enhance conservation, such as species-specific gears based on knowledge of the environment and species behaviour, as reported for other developing regions in the world (López Cazorla, 2004;Sievanen, 2014;García-Quijano & Valdés-Pizzini, 2015).…”
Section: Fek In the Bbe As A Conservation Toolsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The review of previous research we did on articles from the field of marine studies focusing on how fishermen's experience-based knowledge can supplement accepted scientific knowledge, reveals an interest in, acknowledgement of, and ambivalence towards the kind of knowledge that fishermen embody. Within science, this knowledge is recognized as clearly embodied, experience-based, and thus unscientific, even though all the articles we reviewed argued for the value of fishermen's knowledge as supplementary to scientific knowledge (Ames, 2002;Anbleyth-Evans & Lacy, 2019;De Celles et al, 2017;Johannes & Neis, 2007;Johnson, 2010Johnson, , 2011Lima et al, 2016;Medeiros et al, 2018;Stephenson et al, 2016;Sulemain, 2018;Quist, 2019).…”
Section: Leif Commented Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences, and the diverging material relations with, and economic and political interests in the sea by fishers, the oil industry, and governmental authorities, constitute these actors as unequally positioned "knowers". Understanding the phenomenotechniques employed by fishers to make sense of oil exploration's uncertain consequences demands attention to fishers' everyday engagements with the sea (Quist, 2018), to technical skills and situated knowledges acquired through fishing, and to fishers' ways of exploring the behavior of different fish species. These situated knowledges are (re)formulated amidst politically mediated opportunities to get access to certain resource spaces, as well as by socially differentiated possibilities to get one's claims taken into account in different policy forums (Nygren, 2018;Nygren and Wayessa, 2018).…”
Section: Historical Ontology and Environmental-social Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In public and scientific debates, attention to the impacts of oil extraction is focused on easily observable, catastrophic events such as oil spills and explosions, while possible effects of oil exploration have received scant attention, despite the fact that exploration is an issue causing increasing tension in many parts of the world (ABC, 2018; Arbo and Thanh Thuy, 2016). In Mexico, the socio-material complexity of determining the harmfulness of oil extraction, the political-economic imperative to expand the hydrocarbon production, and the political legacy of oil as the symbol of patrimony, complicate the efforts to carefully examine the effects of oil industry on local environments and communities (Quist, 2018;Salas Landa, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%