2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishhook Removal: Case Reports and a Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However in their technique the barb was not cut as it was easily disengaged by slight rotation which was possible in the first web space of the hand 5 . The retrograde pulling method is used successfully all types of barbed hooks 4 . The hook is pulled back through and the barbed end is pulled under direct vision, thus minimizing injury to soft tissue or the underlying structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in their technique the barb was not cut as it was easily disengaged by slight rotation which was possible in the first web space of the hand 5 . The retrograde pulling method is used successfully all types of barbed hooks 4 . The hook is pulled back through and the barbed end is pulled under direct vision, thus minimizing injury to soft tissue or the underlying structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prats et al (2013) emphasized the management of injuries caused by barbed hooks but showed his method on only two cases (5). Nabi et al discouraged home removal of fish hooks by unqualified persons in a single case report (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them designed for preventing further injury of barb during removing. There are few articles describing methods and its success rates [8]. Type of fishhook, location of injury and the depth of fishhook in tissue affects the technique selection.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%