2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishing access agreements and harvesting decisions of host and distant water fishing nations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where possible reflagged fleets are corrected to their likely true identity as this relates to access rights assumed in the mapping process. As most marine resources are in the shallower inshore areas now claimed by coastal countries as their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ), the fishing access of fleets is an important part of mapping global fishing and is a major part of the resource management 21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where possible reflagged fleets are corrected to their likely true identity as this relates to access rights assumed in the mapping process. As most marine resources are in the shallower inshore areas now claimed by coastal countries as their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ), the fishing access of fleets is an important part of mapping global fishing and is a major part of the resource management 21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ) ( 11 ), rather the large yields can be explained by the relatively small population size. These findings add to concerns about agreements to fish in low- and middle-income nations ( 11 , 28 , 29 ), highlighting that such agreements reduce nations’ ability to direct their own food production toward citizens experiencing nutritional insecurity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…While the Malagasy government signs fishing agreements with foreign countries, these licensing deals lack transparency and have caused conflict between Malagasy fishers and Ministry representatives in the past. Equity issues loom large with regards to predatory fishing agreements between wealthy DWFN and economically poor yet resource rich countries like Madagascar (Gagern & van den Bergh, 2013; Nichols et al, 2015). For example, Le Manach et al 2012 analyzed fishing agreements between the European Union (EU) and Madagascar since 1986 and found that while EU quotas increased by 30% over time, Madagascar’s financial benefit from these agreements decreased by 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%