2002
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2002110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishways : Biological Basis, Limits and Legal Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the species that utilized the fishway, these species lack the motivation to use the fishway; their usage therefore was not confirmed. The main biological aim of installing a fishway is to enable movement of anadromous and potamodromous fish to their spawning grounds and to help freshwater fish downstream of the weir move upstream (and vice versa), preventing isolation between the two areas [20]. Genetic differences between upstream and downstream species, due to long-term isolation resulting from a structure constructed across the river, have been reported [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the species that utilized the fishway, these species lack the motivation to use the fishway; their usage therefore was not confirmed. The main biological aim of installing a fishway is to enable movement of anadromous and potamodromous fish to their spawning grounds and to help freshwater fish downstream of the weir move upstream (and vice versa), preventing isolation between the two areas [20]. Genetic differences between upstream and downstream species, due to long-term isolation resulting from a structure constructed across the river, have been reported [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, delayed migration will result in increased energetic expense, elevated predation risk, and may interrupt physiological transition that enables fish to enter the marine environment. Unfortunately, the impact of delayed migration on longterm survival is not always considered when evaluating fish guidance efficiency (Porcher & Travade, 2002). Second, the nature of the behavioural response exhibited is often variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where dams and other structures that can obstruct a river stretch have been constructed, these obstructions have been responsible for the decline of migratory species abundance (Agostinho et al, 2005), including the disappearance of entire stocks (salmon in the Rhine, Seine, and Garonne rivers, among others, in France) (Porcher & Travade, 2002). It is necessary to maintain free passage through all of the obstructions existing in a hydrographic basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%