2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fishy Business: Red Snapper Mislabeling Along the Coastline of the Southeastern United States

Abstract: Seafood mislabeling is a widely documented problem that has significant implications for human and environmental health. Defined as when seafood is sold under something other than its true species name, seafood fraud allows less-desired or illegally caught species to be marketed as one recognizable to consumers. Red snapper is one of the most frequently mislabeled species, with previous studies showing mislabeling rates as high as 77%. We assessed whether red snapper mislabeling rates varied among states or ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This statewide mislabeling frequency is consistent with the 35% shrimp mislabeling frequency nationwide [18]. Although this frequency is lower than that of other species in North Carolina, e.g., red snapper, [19] the results suggest shrimp mislabeling is a fairly common problem. Interestingly, the average selling price of accurately labeled shrimp was more than $2 greater, suggesting that vendors knowingly or subconsciously placed lower values on mislabeled products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This statewide mislabeling frequency is consistent with the 35% shrimp mislabeling frequency nationwide [18]. Although this frequency is lower than that of other species in North Carolina, e.g., red snapper, [19] the results suggest shrimp mislabeling is a fairly common problem. Interestingly, the average selling price of accurately labeled shrimp was more than $2 greater, suggesting that vendors knowingly or subconsciously placed lower values on mislabeled products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To bring the overall volume to 25 μl, 18.8 μl of molecular grade water was added to the PCR bead tubes with the CO1 primer and 21.4 μl was added to the PCR bead tubes with the CytB and ND2 primers. Once the PCR bead was dissolved, we placed the tubes into a Bio-Rad T100 Thermal Cycler and used the protocol from (Spencer & Bruno, 2019).…”
Section: Dna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All acquired fish were in fillet or portion form. The selection of fillets instead of whole fish was due to the majority of all fish mislabeling occurring not on whole fish, but on fish in fillet and portion forms [25]. All fish were delivered frozen, and upon arrival placed in a −20 • C freezer.…”
Section: Obtaining and Storing The Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%