1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.58.11685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiske steps in annular Josephson junctions with trapped flux quanta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns were reported by different groups [139][140][141]. The pattern shown in [142] or by the size of the junction [143]. So the experiments on the modulation pattern of the critical current in the single Josephson junction support the existence of the d-wave pairing symmetry.…”
Section: Fig 17supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Similar patterns were reported by different groups [139][140][141]. The pattern shown in [142] or by the size of the junction [143]. So the experiments on the modulation pattern of the critical current in the single Josephson junction support the existence of the d-wave pairing symmetry.…”
Section: Fig 17supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The voltage position of the maximized Fiske resonance is determined by the number of trapped flux quanta. [5][6][7] We note that at values above a certain number of trapped flux quanta, the voltage position of the maximized Fiske resonance should exceed twice the superconducting energy gap, ⌬, freeing the quasiparticle branch of the current-voltage ͑I -V͒ characteristic from the presence of any Fiske resonance. The trapping of magnetic flux quanta eliminates the need for sustaining the external magnetic field during the detector working time and eliminates the problem of fluctuations and drifts of the magnetic field value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, the dependence of the amplitudes of Fiske steps versus the applied magnetic field can be predicted [3]. In the course of the years this model has been generalized to more complex Josephson structures: two-dimensional JJs [4], annular JJs [5], SQUIDs or arrays of JJs [6], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%