1995
DOI: 10.1080/00253359.1995.10656557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Fit for Service Abroad’: Promotion, Retirement and Royal Navy Officers, 1830–1890

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…82 Nevertheless, failure to alter the seniority system or establish a retirement age resulted in a group of admirals so aged that in 1863 no admiral or vice admiral was available for the rigours of appointment to major command as a result of their great age or infirmities. 83 As early as 1674 half pay was introduced for commanders of first-and secondrate ships, and second captains of flagships. 84 By the end of the eighteenth century half pay had been extended to commanders, lieutenants and warrant officers.…”
Section: Seniority and Retirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…82 Nevertheless, failure to alter the seniority system or establish a retirement age resulted in a group of admirals so aged that in 1863 no admiral or vice admiral was available for the rigours of appointment to major command as a result of their great age or infirmities. 83 As early as 1674 half pay was introduced for commanders of first-and secondrate ships, and second captains of flagships. 84 By the end of the eighteenth century half pay had been extended to commanders, lieutenants and warrant officers.…”
Section: Seniority and Retirementmentioning
confidence: 99%