2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness costs of intrinsic competition in two egg parasitoids of a true bug

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eggs were fixed to white filter paper with white, nontoxic glue (LePage). Negative fitness effects of intraspecific superparasitism on offspring were unlikely because (1) patch guarding behaviour of this species reduces superparasitism levels (Field, ) and (2) fitness effects of intraspecific superparasitism in this superfamily of parasitoids are negligible (Abram et al ., ; Cusumano et al ., ). After exposure to parasitoids, eggs were incubated under standard rearing conditions (16 : 8 h light/dark cycle at 24 ± 1 °C and 50% relative humidity) until parasitoid emergence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Eggs were fixed to white filter paper with white, nontoxic glue (LePage). Negative fitness effects of intraspecific superparasitism on offspring were unlikely because (1) patch guarding behaviour of this species reduces superparasitism levels (Field, ) and (2) fitness effects of intraspecific superparasitism in this superfamily of parasitoids are negligible (Abram et al ., ; Cusumano et al ., ). After exposure to parasitoids, eggs were incubated under standard rearing conditions (16 : 8 h light/dark cycle at 24 ± 1 °C and 50% relative humidity) until parasitoid emergence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This reduction in size is probably due to changes in host quality caused by scramble competition, resulting in lower resources available for immatures to consume (Cusumano et al, 2015). In short superparasitism time intervals, winning parasitoids, from either the first or the second clutch, were 5.1% smaller than control individuals, and thus had an expected reduced fitness.…”
Section: Survival Of the Second Clutch In Short Superparasitism Time mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short superparasitism time intervals, winning parasitoids, from either the first or the second clutch, were 5.1% smaller than control individuals, and thus had an expected reduced fitness. This reduction in size is probably due to changes in host quality caused by scramble competition, resulting in lower resources available for immatures to consume (Cusumano et al, 2015). Longer intervals (17-19 h and 27-29 h) allowed the first clutch to hatch prior to the second clutch and to monopolise all resources, with no size reduction being detected in emerging adults.…”
Section: Survival Of the Second Clutch In Short Superparasitism Time mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this reproduction improvement in case of double infestation, the effect of competition on the reproduction of the mite could still appear at higher densities of foundresses (Donzé et al 1996) or even in doubly infested cells on more subtle aspects of the parasite cycle. The size and fertility of the progeny may be impacted by the competition experienced early in their life, as in the case of parasitoids (Cusumano et al 2015). The analysis of the mites' daughters in relation to the infestation treatment during their larval development could thus be an interesting path to investigate.…”
Section: Impact Of Double Infestation and Optimization Of The Reproductive Successmentioning
confidence: 99%