2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00707.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitness costs of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in the Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella

Abstract: Genetic changes in insects that result in insecticide resistance can also affect their fitness. Here, we report measurements of development time and survival of the Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner), to compare the relative fitness of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)-susceptible and -resistant colonies. Measurements of larval development time and survival indicated that a fitness cost was associated with resistance to Bt in some Bt-resistant colonies but not others. Comparisons of geographically diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…entomocidus, strain HD198 (15). The resistant colony is ϳ100 times less sensitive to this particular subspecies of Bt than the parent colony (16). Several explanations have been provided for this difference, including proteinase deficiencies, decreased toxin binding affinity, and a reduction in the number of toxin receptors (14,17).…”
Section: Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2:19 -28 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…entomocidus, strain HD198 (15). The resistant colony is ϳ100 times less sensitive to this particular subspecies of Bt than the parent colony (16). Several explanations have been provided for this difference, including proteinase deficiencies, decreased toxin binding affinity, and a reduction in the number of toxin receptors (14,17).…”
Section: Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2:19 -28 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if resistance entails a fitness cost, the spread of a recessive allele could be prevented by an appropriate resistance management strategy (Lenormand and Raymond, 1998;Carrière and Tabashnik, 2001;Carrière et al, 2004;Bates et al, 2005). Although fitness costs associated with Bt resistance were not always detected (eg Gould and Anderson, 1991;Tang et al 1997), they have been reported in many pests (Groeters et al, 1994;Trisyono and Whalon, 1997;Alyokhin and Ferro, 1999;Oppert et al, 2000;Carrière et al, 2001a, b;Akhurst et al, 2003;Janmaat and Myers, 2003;Higginson et al, 2005. Bird and Akhurst (2004 showed that, in H. armigera, most fitness costs associated with Bt resistance (eg a lower percentage of survival or a longer mean time to pupation) are recessive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have failed to reveal any detrimental effects of insecticide resistance (Follett et al, 1993;Tang et al, 1997Tang et al, , 1999Baker et al, 1998) and some have shown such organisms to be even more successful than their susceptible counterparts in the absence of insecticides (Omer et al, 1992;Bloch and Wool, 1994;White and Bell, 1995;Mason, 1998;Haubruge and Arnaud, 2001). In other studies, some measures of fitness have been negatively affected, others positively (Brewer and Trumble, 1991) and different strains of insect, exhibiting resistance to the same compound, can show opposite associations (Chevillon et al, 1997;Hollingsworth et al, 1997;Oppert et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%