Fitness for work: bridging the gap in ergonomics

Abstract

One ofthe major problems in applying ergonomics, as experienced during 25 years of consultancy and lecturing, lies in the fact that emphasis is laid either on the technology or on the field of human shortcomings of a physical or psychosocial nature. While each approach has its place in the man-machine system, they should not be treated separately but be integrated.Ergonomics is more than the optimization of work places and environment, of tools and machines, and of the safety of workers: it means putting an optimally healthy person into an optimal working situation. A system that embraces simultaneously the condition of the worker, with focus on health, safety and wellbeing, and the work and work situation, will produce optimal impact. Consumers, scientists, designers and ergonomists should be taught to be more critical in their approach to daily contact with the technical world. Examples are given of gaps in the man-work relatioriship. Even the recognition of the existence of such gaps may contribute to a more effective and beneficial application of ergonomics.

Women in Nontraditional Jobs

“…Although selection, training, and placement of the female according to physical capacity is essential, design of the workplace is also important. Ergonomics means "putting an optimally healthy person into an optimal working situation" (Boudri, 1985). Ideally, stressful jobs could be redesigned to reduce strength demands.…”

“…The employer is responsible for providing a safe and healthy work environment. When ergonomics is not feasible, the selection, training, and placement of employees is essential (Boudri, 1985). Every employee must be involved in ergonomics as a strategy for preventing musculoskeletal injury.…”