2013
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0397-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting correlated residual error structures in nonlinear mixed-effects models using SAS PROC NLMIXED

Abstract: Nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) models remain popular among practitioners for analyzing continuous repeated measures data taken on each of a number of individuals when interest centers on characterizing individual-specific change. Within this framework, variation and correlation among the repeated measurements may be partitioned into interindividual variation and intraindividual variation components. The covariance structure of the residuals are, in many applications, consigned to be independent with homogeneou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could possibly lead to some misspecification, especially given that the model-implied covariance similarly requires the researcher to select the appropriate structures of Ψ and Θ, similar to CPMMs. The most general, parsimonious form of the covariance structure is 1/2 1/2  Σ D PD where the variance matrix, D, can have its own structure uncoupled from the correlational (off-diagonal) structure in P (see, Harring & Blozis, 2014). Covariance structures in either CPMMs and GMMs can be seen as restricted versions of this most general structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could possibly lead to some misspecification, especially given that the model-implied covariance similarly requires the researcher to select the appropriate structures of Ψ and Θ, similar to CPMMs. The most general, parsimonious form of the covariance structure is 1/2 1/2  Σ D PD where the variance matrix, D, can have its own structure uncoupled from the correlational (off-diagonal) structure in P (see, Harring & Blozis, 2014). Covariance structures in either CPMMs and GMMs can be seen as restricted versions of this most general structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, this is a limitation with SAS PROC NLMIXED that allows random effects but not autocorrelated errors. Recently, Harring and Blozis have shown how autocorrelated errors can be estimated by this procedure, but their approach is limited to complete data across time and not as many within‐subject observations as is obtained in EMA studies. In some cases, dependency is accommodated by using a lagged dependent variable as a predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data that are collected over time such as this data often have serial correlation in the random error term (Sen and Srivastava 1990). To account for this correlation, an AR (2) autocorrelation error structure was incorporated into the likelihood function using the fitting technique described by Harring and Blozis (2014). The AR (2) model assumes that e ij = ϕ 1 × e ij-1 + ϕ 2 × e ij-2 + a ij where a ij are independently normally distributed errors with a mean of 0 (Seber and Wild 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood function for an AR (2) process from Seber and Wild (1989, pp. 286-288) was programed in place of the AR (1) structure presented in Harring and Blozis (2014). The variance of a ij (see AR (2) model definition above) is often assumed to be constant across all observations but a preliminary analysis showed that it varies considerably by tree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%