2019
DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2019.1622407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Fitting in’ and ‘standing out’: the peer group and young people’s development of reader identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially this one." Sellers (2019) defines "a reading identity" as related to an individual's "ways of reading, of being a reader, and the extent to which they view themselves as 'someone who reads'" (p. 938), exploring the role that the peer group may play in this identity formation. With reading and being a reader influenced by an individual's broader social influences, the affordance of reader-supportive spaces such as school libraries where students can connect with like-minded peers can be important to support the orientation of students who identify as readers.…”
Section: Belonging and Sanctuarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially this one." Sellers (2019) defines "a reading identity" as related to an individual's "ways of reading, of being a reader, and the extent to which they view themselves as 'someone who reads'" (p. 938), exploring the role that the peer group may play in this identity formation. With reading and being a reader influenced by an individual's broader social influences, the affordance of reader-supportive spaces such as school libraries where students can connect with like-minded peers can be important to support the orientation of students who identify as readers.…”
Section: Belonging and Sanctuarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Frankel (2016;2017;2019b) rightly highlights the need for more research adopting a sociocultural approach to understand how classroom practices (e.g., messages about reading) influence students' perceptions of a reader. Furthermore, Sellers (2019) recently discussed the role of peer groups in young adolescents' development of their reader identity.…”
Section: Limitations and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of reader identity among school populations most commonly make the distinction between students who self-identify as good/skilled readers and those that self-identify as poor/struggling/non-readers (e.g., Clark, Osborne, and Akerman, 2008;Hall, 2012Hall, , 2016), although there are exceptions. For example, Sellers (2019) recognised four reader identities: the resistant reader, the indifferent reader, the outsider reader and the social reader. The reader identities children and adolescents construct are shaped by past and current reading experiences (successful or not), their environment (home and school) and messages conveyed by important others (i.e., family, peers and school) (Clark et al, 2008;Frankel, 2017;Glenn, Ginsberg, and King-Watkins, 2017;Sellers, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Edmunds and Bauserman, 2006; Eriksson Barajas and Aronsson, 2009; Glenn et al, 2018) have been used; however, discussions among children (Hall, 2012; Levy and Thompson, 2015; Maine, 2014), written reflections (Hall, 2016), observations of classroom, library or community literacy practices (Frankel, 2017; Hall, 2012; Pahl and Allan, 2011), photographs and videos (Pahl and Allan, 2011), scrapbooks (Pahl and Allan, 2011), the collection of artefacts (e.g. photographs of students' literacy work) (Frankel, 2017; Pahl and Allan, 2011) or visual mappings of children's reading journeys via rivers/roads to chart their reading histories (Cremin et al, 2014; Sellers, 2019) have also been applied. Indeed, literacy research to date has employed a broad range of innovative methodological approaches, yet it is rare for the methodological knowledge acquired to be shared to improve the use of these methods for other literacy researchers or practitioners (although see Levy and Thompson, 2015; Pahl and Allan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%