2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting large-scale structured additive regression models using Krylov subspace methods

Abstract: Fitting regression models can be challenging when regression coefficients are high-dimensional. Especially when large spatial or temporal effects need to be taken into account the limits of computational capacities of normal working stations are reached quickly. The analysis of images with several million pixels, where each pixel value can be seen as an observation on a new spatial location, represent such a situation. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework for the applied statistician is presented that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-registration and registration to standard space was performed using a spline interpolation with FSL FLIRT (26, 27). Lesion segmentation was done semi-automatically on FLAIR using the lesion prediction algorithm [LPA (28)] as implemented in the Lesion Segmentation Toolbox version 2.0.15 (www.statistical-modelling.de/lst.html). Lesion masks were subsequently manually corrected using ITK-SNAP (29) (www.itksnap.org).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-registration and registration to standard space was performed using a spline interpolation with FSL FLIRT (26, 27). Lesion segmentation was done semi-automatically on FLAIR using the lesion prediction algorithm [LPA (28)] as implemented in the Lesion Segmentation Toolbox version 2.0.15 (www.statistical-modelling.de/lst.html). Lesion masks were subsequently manually corrected using ITK-SNAP (29) (www.itksnap.org).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion-weighted, multi-echo GRE and FLAIR images were registered to the T1w anatomic image using the boundary based registration tool in FreeSurfer. White matter lesion segmentation was performed using the lesion prediction algorithm as implemented in the Lesion Segmentation Toolbox (v. 2.0.13; www.statistical-modelling.de/lst.html) for SPM12 [25]. The generated lesion masks were then manually edited by an experienced neuroradiologist (F.Y., 7 years of experience) using the FLAIR images for reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WMHs in a total of 25 subjects were manually delineated by a neuroradiologist to be used as ground truth lesion segmentations for evaluation of the proposed method. We compared the proposed method with three state-of-the-art methods; two publicly available WMH segmentation methods, i.e., the Lesion Growth Algorithm (LGA) (Schmidt et al., 2012) and the Lesion Prediction Algorithm (LPA) (Schmidt, 2017) as implemented in the LST toolbox2 version 2.0.15, and one method developed previously for the AGES-Reykjavik data set based on an artificial neural network classifier (ANNC) (Sigurdsson et al., 2012): LGA segments WMHs from T1-w and FLAIR images. A CSF, GM and WM segmentation is first obtained from the T1-w image and combined with FLAIR image intensities for calculation of WMH belief maps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%