2012
DOI: 10.21314/jor.2012.244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fitting the generalized Pareto distribution to commercial fire loss severity: evidence from Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At p% level, it may be defined as expected returns of the portfolio in the worst p% cases. For example, ES (0.1) is the expectation of the worst 10 cases out of 100 cases (Lee, 2012).By definition ES is defined as for confidence level "q" ES q = E(loss given that loss > VaR q ). After solving the above conditional expectation, we get the following form for GPD.…”
Section: Value At Risk and Expected Shortfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At p% level, it may be defined as expected returns of the portfolio in the worst p% cases. For example, ES (0.1) is the expectation of the worst 10 cases out of 100 cases (Lee, 2012).By definition ES is defined as for confidence level "q" ES q = E(loss given that loss > VaR q ). After solving the above conditional expectation, we get the following form for GPD.…”
Section: Value At Risk and Expected Shortfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one solution could be to consider a general class of distributions for fire loss data. Keeping the hope that these distributions would be flexible enough and conform the underlying data of fire loss severity in a reasonable way (Lee, 2012). We considered different parametric distributions like exponential, Pareto, gamma, logistic, generalized extreme value (GEV) and Generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) in this study.…”
Section: Selection Of the Probability Model For Commercial Fire Loss Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparative analysis of two composite models, namely, log-normal-Pareto and Weibull-Pareto, was carried out in [5]. Lee [6] undertook the modeling of fire loss severity (from Taiwan) using GP distribution, with the determination of the thresholds being carried out using mean excess plots and Hill plots. Several tests for goodness-of-fit were conducted and Value-at-Risk (VaR) as well as Expected Shortfall (ES) were determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show how the decision-making process, relating to the pricing of reinsurance, is optimized when considering a risk transfer position. Brazauskasa and Kleefeld (2016) modelled the severity and the tail risk associated with the Norwegian fire claims while that of Taiwan was fitted using the Generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) (Lee, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%