2018
DOI: 10.1177/1049732318807208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five Approaches to Qualitative Comparison Groups in Health Research: A Scoping Review

Abstract: Qualitative researchers have much to gain by using comparison groups. Although their use within qualitative health research is increasing, the guidelines surrounding them are lacking. The purpose of this article is to explore the extent to which qualitative comparison groups are being used within health research and to outline the lessons learned in using this type of methodology. Through conducting a scoping review, 31 articles were identified that demonstrated five different types of qualitative comparison g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalizability means a more complete picture of the nature of and sources of differences, which can better guide education decision makers and policymakers (Ercikan & Roth, 2006). It is not only quantitative researchers who think in these ways; many qualitative researchers also think that including comparison groups can address biases, enhance rigor and credibility of the findings (Lindsay, 2019; Morse, 2015), and increase the trustworthiness (Guba & Lincoln, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalizability means a more complete picture of the nature of and sources of differences, which can better guide education decision makers and policymakers (Ercikan & Roth, 2006). It is not only quantitative researchers who think in these ways; many qualitative researchers also think that including comparison groups can address biases, enhance rigor and credibility of the findings (Lindsay, 2019; Morse, 2015), and increase the trustworthiness (Guba & Lincoln, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, participants can be clearly divided into two groups, an "older group" (above 38 years old at the time of data collection) of six participants, and a "younger group" (below 38 years old) of ten participants in the interviews, and eight in the focus groups. The codebook for both groups is the same, and the comparison between them followed Lindsay's (2019) guidelines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, by comparing the practices in two countries with different health care systems and cultural backgrounds, with a multicultural research team, we were able to explore the characteristics of both countries that may not be easily recognized by examining one system in isolation [20,23]. Comparative studies of countries such as this would be useful in examining different methods and systems beyond existing systematic boundaries [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%