2022
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five Cases of Corneal Graft Rejection After Recent COVID-19 Vaccinations and a Review of the Literature

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to report 5 cases of acute corneal graft rejection after COVID-19 vaccination and perform a review of the literature.Methods: This was a case series and review of literature dated on the October 10, 2021. Results:We describe 5 cases-2 patients with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy) who presented with acute corneal graft rejection after their first dose of mRNA (BNT162) vaccine. The other 3 patients who had penetrating keratopla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells in the anterior chamber There were 42 case reports [5][6][7][8][11][12][13]17,18,[20][21][22][24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], 8 case series [9,10,14,28,36,46,47,58] and 2 cohort studies [19,23]. These studies were conducted in t...…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells in the anterior chamber There were 42 case reports [5][6][7][8][11][12][13]17,18,[20][21][22][24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], 8 case series [9,10,14,28,36,46,47,58] and 2 cohort studies [19,23]. These studies were conducted in t...…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen eyes (38.9%) had received at least one previous allograft (Balidis et al, 2021 ; Dhillon et al, 2017 ; Gouvea et al, 2022 ; Molero‐Senosiain et al, 2022 ; Parmar et al, 2021 ; Phylactou et al, 2021 ; Rajagopal & Priyanka, 2022 ; Rallis et al, 2021 ; Shah et al, 2022 ; Simão & Kwitko, 2022 ; Wasser et al, 2021 ; Yu et al, 2022 ) including redo PKP (6 eyes), (Balidis et al, 2021 ; Parmar et al, 2021 ; Simão & Kwitko, 2022 ; Wasser et al, 2021 ; Yu et al, 2022 ) PKP after limbal or sclerokeratoplasty grafts (2 eyes), (Gouvea et al, 2022 ; Shah et al, 2022 ) redo EK (4 eyes), (Balidis et al, 2021 ; Molero‐Senosiain et al, 2022 ; Phylactou et al, 2021 ) and PKP after failed EK (2 eyes). (Rajagopal & Priyanka, 2022 ; Rallis et al, 2021 ) Two eyes had more than 3 corneal grafts (Molero‐Senosiain et al, 2022 ; Simão & Kwitko, 2022 ) and four eyes (11.1%) had a history of previous rejection episodes (Abousy et al, 2021 ; Balidis et al, 2021 ; Molero‐Senosiain et al, 2022 ; Simão & Kwitko, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolution of rejection signs on the allograft (anatomical resolution) was reported in 28 eyes (77.8%), with five eyes (13.9%) evolving to allograft failure and three eyes (8.3%) showing partial anatomical improvement. When functional resolution was considered (based on improvement of BCVA to at least 50% of the BCVA before the acute allograft rejection episode), the rate of partial resolution increased to 11.1% due to one case reported by Molero‐Senosiain et al in which BCVA before rejection was 0.52 logMAR and final BCVA after anatomical resolution was 0.80 logMAR (Molero‐Senosiain et al, 2022 ). Management strategies and outcomes of acute corneal allograft rejection following SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination are presented in Tables 3 and 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the inception of various nation-based vaccination programmes, ophthalmologists have identi ed and sought to publish cases of corneal transplant rejection with a temporal association to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and many such case reports have been published to date. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] However, case reports are low level evidence which can be subject to observer, reporting and publication bias. As physicians, we have the duty to offer our patients sound medical advice based on the best available evidence and to not unnecessarily contribute to vaccine hesitancy, if unwarranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%