2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01627.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five questions on ecological speciation addressed with individual‐based simulations

Abstract: We use an individual‐based simulation model to investigate factors influencing progress toward ecological speciation. We find that environmental differences can quickly lead to the evolution of substantial reproductive barriers between a population colonizing a new environment and the ancestral population in the old environment. Natural selection against immigrants and hybrids was a major contributor to this isolation, but the evolution of sexual preference was also important. Increasing dispersal had both pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
118
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(102 reference statements)
7
118
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This adaptive divergence may have generated selection on both divergent habitat preference and/or reproductive timing that can lead to IBE patterns observed in our study (Rundle and Nosil, 2005). Theoretical studies have indeed shown that IBE can result from strong selection in the whole or in large parts of the genome, especially when assortative mating mechanisms occur (mate choice, differences in reproductive timing or habitat choice; Thibert-Plante and Hendry, 2009, 2011. In addition to geographical distance, such a divergence in habitat preference and reproductive timing may in turn constrain the gene flow among populations along the gradient and contribute to the maintenance of local adaptation (IBA; Nosil et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This adaptive divergence may have generated selection on both divergent habitat preference and/or reproductive timing that can lead to IBE patterns observed in our study (Rundle and Nosil, 2005). Theoretical studies have indeed shown that IBE can result from strong selection in the whole or in large parts of the genome, especially when assortative mating mechanisms occur (mate choice, differences in reproductive timing or habitat choice; Thibert-Plante and Hendry, 2009, 2011. In addition to geographical distance, such a divergence in habitat preference and reproductive timing may in turn constrain the gene flow among populations along the gradient and contribute to the maintenance of local adaptation (IBA; Nosil et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Such local adaptation could impede gene flow between the northern and southern regions occupied by R. damarensis (Gillam & McCracken, 2007; Rundle & Nosil, 2005) through several processes including selection against migrants (Hendry, 2004; Thibert‐Plante & Hendry, 2009) or matching habitat choice (Edelaar, Siepielski, & Clobert, 2008). The latter process is likely if bats, especially at the margins of suitable habitat (e.g., Märcker and Uintjiesberg populations in our study), choose habitats on the basis of maximizing their detection ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection for assortative mating results when these subpopulations exchange migrants and matings with maladapted immigrants produce unfit hybrids. The classical scenario is reinforcement after secondary contact following initial divergence during an allopatric phase (e.g., Kirkpatrick, 2000;Mizera & Meszéna, 2003;van Doorn et al, 2009;Thibert-Plante & Hendry, 2009). Such initial divergence, however, does not require allopatry, and can even evolve with random mating across demes (e.g., in a Levene model; Kisdi & Priklopil, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%