Five Robust Trait Dimensions: Development, Stability, and Utility

Digman, John M.

doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00480.x

Cited by 401 publications

(299 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

271

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Model Velikih pet je hijerarhijski model crta ličnosti, nastao na osnovu leksičkih istraživanja personalnih atributa, koji pretpostavlja da se bazična struktura ličnosti može opisati pomoću sledećih pet crta: (1) Ekstraverzija ili Surgencija (pričljivost, asertivnost, energetičnost), (2) Saradljivost (dobra narav, kooperativnost, poverenje u druge), (3) Savesnost (urednost, odgovornost, oslanjanje na druge), (4) Emocionalna stabilnost nasuprot Neuroticizmu (smirenost, bez lakog uznemiravanja) i (5) Intelekt ili Otvorenost (intelektualna radoznalost, sklonost imaginaciji, otvorenost uma) (Digman, 1989;Digman, 1990;Goldberg, 1990). Sam upitnik BFI sastoji se od 44 ajtema koje čine kratke rečenice, izuzetno lake za razumevanje.…”

Section: Prednost Kratkih Formi Upitnikaunclassified

Validacija Upitnika Ličnosti Bfi-10 – Kratke Forme Inventara Velikih Pet

Pejić¹,

Tenjović²,

Knežević³

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

U ovom istraživanju proveravana je validnost desetoajtemskog upitnika BFI-10, namenjenog proceni crta ličnosti iz modela Velikih pet. Ispitivanje je obavljeno na uzorku od 112 ispitanika i njima bliskih osoba (N = 203). Proveravana je pouzdanost ukupnih rezultata na skalama upitnika, kao i konvergentna, divergentna i prediktivna validnost. Skale Otvorenost i Saradljivost pokazale su nižu pouzdanost od ostalih. Prosečna interkorelacija skala domena iznosila je .16 i govori u prilog divergentne validnosti upitnika. Konvergentna validnost proverena je: (1) korelacijama rezultata na skalama upitnika BFI-10 sa rezultatima na skalama poznatog upitnika NEO PI-R koje služe za procenu sličnih konstrukata (M r = .61); (2) korelacijama mera samoprocene dobijenih na BFI-10 sa procenama od strane dveju bliskih osoba muškog i ženskog pola (M r = .37). Prediktivna validnost upitnika potvrđena je značajnim korelacijama sa rezultatima na Upitniku za procenu svakodnevnog ponašanja. Rezultati sugerišu da je upitnik BFI-10 moguće koristiti za grubu procenu bazičnih crta ličnosti u istraživanjima u kojima je neophodno korišćenje izuzetno kratkih skala i u kojima procena ličnosti nije osnovni cilj.

show abstract

Section: Prednost Kratkih Formi Upitnikaunclassified

Validacija Upitnika Ličnosti Bfi-10 – Kratke Forme Inventara Velikih Pet

Pejić¹,

Tenjović²,

Knežević³

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Building on earlier studies that have shown that a considerable portion of adults' personality differences is captured by the Big Five dimensions of personality ( John & Srivastava, 1999), researchers have also studied, in recent years, children's and adolescents' personality in terms of the Big Five (Asendorpf & van Aken, in press;Digman, 1989;John, Caspi, Robins, Moffitt & Stouthamer-Loeber, 1994;Kohnstamm, Halverson, Mervielde, & Havill, 1998;Mervielde & Asendorpf, 2000;Mervielde, Buyst, & De Fruyt, 1995;Mervielde & De Fruyt, 2000;Scholte, van Aken, & Van Lieshout, 1997;Van Lieshout & Haselager, 1994).…”

Section: The Present Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality–relationship transaction in young adulthood.

Neyer

Asendorpf²

2001

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

472

585

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personality and social relationships were assessed twice across a 4-year period in a general population sample of 489 German young adults. Two kinds of personality-relationship transaction were observed. First, mean-level change in personality toward maturity (e.g., increase in Conscientiousness and decrease in Neuroticism) was moderated by the transition to partnership but was independent of other developmental transitions. Second, individual differences in personality traits predicted social relationships much better than vice versa. Specifically, once initial correlations were controlled for, Extraversion, Shyness, Neuroticism, self-esteem, and Agreeableness predicted change in various qualities of relationships (especially with friends and colleagues), whereas only quality of relationships with preschool children predicted later Extraversion and Neuroticism. Consequences for the transactional view of personality in young adulthood are discussed.

show abstract

“…Our analyses are based on data from the Hawaii Personality and Health Cohort, a relatively large and culturally diverse sample that was first assessed between 1959 and 1967 when the participants were children in Hawaii. The childhood assessments were designed and supervised by the late John M. Digman, and formed the basis for some of the pioneering work on the five-factor structure of personality (e.g., Digman, 1989 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Those authors identified 34 studies in which the age at first assessment was between 6 and 12 years, which corresponds to the ages of our child participants at their first assessment. In 24 of these studies, the method of personality assessment was observer ratings; however, there were few studies (not including that of Digman, 1989, which is based on a portion of the data reported here) in which teacher assessments were used. Rubin, Hymel, and Mills (1989) used both parent and teacher ratings of sociability and social withdrawal in young children; social withdrawal observed at kindergarten and at grade 2 (N = 52) were significantly correlated (r = .37, p < .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, a five-factor structure corresponding to the adult Big Five (the "Little Five") was identified by John, Caspi, Robins, Moffitt, and Stouthamer-Loeber (1994) in young adolescents. And, Digman (1989;Digman & Inouye, 1986;Digman & Takemoto-Chock, 1981) found clear versions of the Big Five factors using small portions of the very data here under study; later, Digman and Shmelyov (1996) found a clear five-factor structure in teacher ratings of Russian 1st, 2nd, and 3rd grade school-children. Together, these studies suggest that the five-factor model of personality can be used for the assessment of both children and adults to determine rank-order stability.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife.

Hampson¹,

Goldberg²

2006

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

276

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report provides some initial findings from an investigation of the relations between childhood Big Five personality traits assessed by elementary-school teachers and similar traits assessed 40 years later by self-reports at midlife. Our analyses are based on data from a relatively large and culturally diverse sample (N = 799) that was first assessed between 1959 and 1967 when the participants were children in Hawaii. Short-term (1-3 years) test retest reliabilities were lower (.22 -.53) within childhood when personality is developing than within adulthood (.70 -.79) when personality stability may be at its peak. Stability coefficients across the 40-year interval between the childhood assessment and two measures of adulthood personality were higher for Extraversion (e.g., .29) and Conscientiousness (e.g., .25) than for Openness (e.g., .16), Agreeableness (e.g., .08) and Neuroticism (e.g., .00). Construct continuity between childhood and adulthood was evaluated by canonical analysis and by structural-equation modeling and indicated continuity at both a broad, twodimensional level and at the level of the Big Five. The findings are discussed in relation to Caspi, Roberts, and Shiner's (2005) principles of rank-order personality stability.Keywords personality stability; Big Five; construct continuity; longitudinal study The extent to which child personality is predictive of adult personality has long been a fundamental scientific, philosophical, and even poetic question. Wordsworth's "The child is father of the man" and Milton's "The child shows the man, as morning shows the day" are not unambiguous. Neither poet was necessarily suggesting perfect correspondence and complete predictability from youth to maturity. Similarly, the stability of personality characteristics over the life course remains a controversial empirical issue. Proponents of stability debate the findings with advocates of transformation and change (McCrae et al., 2000;Lewis, 2001).In this report, we provide some initial findings from an investigation of the relations between childhood personality traits assessed by elementary-school teachers and similar traits assessed by self-reports at mid-life. Our analyses are based on data from the Hawaii Personality and Health Cohort, a relatively large and culturally diverse sample that was first assessed between 1959 and 1967 when the participants were children in Hawaii. The childhood assessments were designed and supervised by the late John M. Digman, and formed the basis for some of the pioneering work on the five-factor structure of personality (e.g., Digman, 1989 NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript assessments were undertaken over a four-year period (1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002) after an interval of 35 -43 years (Hampson et al., 2001). Consequently, these data offer an extraordinary opportunity to examine the question of personality stability from childhood to midlife with measures of the five-factor model of personality at each time point. We have be...

show abstract

Five Robust Trait Dimensions: Development, Stability, and Utility

Cited by 401 publications

References 26 publications

Validacija Upitnika Ličnosti Bfi-10 – Kratke Forme Inventara Velikih Pet

Validacija Upitnika Ličnosti Bfi-10 – Kratke Forme Inventara Velikih Pet

Personality–relationship transaction in young adulthood.

A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About