2003
DOI: 10.28945/527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five Roles of an Information System: A Social Constructionist Approach to Analysing the Use of ERP Systems

Abstract: This paper presents a novel way of thinking about how information systems are used in organisations. Traditionally, computerised information systems are viewed as objects. In contrast, by viewing the information system as an actor, the understanding of the structuration process increases. The user, being influenced by the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system and giving it an actor role, thereby also confers agency on the ERP system; through its very use it influences actions and thus also the structure. B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A more heterogeneous group would most likely have strengthened the picture with nuances and contradictions of the enterprise system, the role of the technology and the implementation process critical factors (cf. Askenäs and Westelius, 2000;Holland and Light, 1999;Keen, 1981;Markus and Robey, 1988).…”
Section: The Administrative Paradox and The Enterprise System In Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more heterogeneous group would most likely have strengthened the picture with nuances and contradictions of the enterprise system, the role of the technology and the implementation process critical factors (cf. Askenäs and Westelius, 2000;Holland and Light, 1999;Keen, 1981;Markus and Robey, 1988).…”
Section: The Administrative Paradox and The Enterprise System In Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A necessary level of standardization and institutionalization needs to be present (Orlikowski, 1992). Askenäs and Westelius (2000) also state that it is not possible for all users (stakeholders) to change the information system according to their own personal wishes. An enterprise system will consequently never be able to adapt totally to every individual's wishes or collective wishes on an organizational level.…”
Section: The Administrative Paradox and The Enterprise System In Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on microchips forms the baseline for many managerial decisions and business strategies. Computerized Information Systems are being used in organizations the world over not only as objects but also as actors (Askenas & Westelius, 2003). Organizations are being compelled to question and redesign their entire existing traditional operations in a way that uses information technologies and information systems design to serve their business better (Vat, 2004).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samtidigt som IT-systemet 226 Se ex. Andréasson & Melin (2011) 227 Yanow (2003) i Hajer & Wagenaar (2003), Askenäs & Westelius (2003) (i exemplet ovan) påverkas av olika sociala kontexter, så påverkar det samtidigt självt dessa. Det går att ta resonemanget om hur tekniken är socialt konstruerad ännu längre: på fabriken där hårdvaran massproduceras har kretskorten en viss dimension på grund av internationella standarder som är konstruerade i sociala sammanhang och så vidare.…”
unclassified
“…I nästa kapi-584 Winner (1985), Albrechtslund (2007), Bannister & Connolly (2014) 585 ), Bannister & Connolly (2014 586 Se ex. Yanow (2003), Askenäs & Westelius (2003) 587 Bannister & Connolly (2014) 588 Hedström (2007) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%