2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five Year Results of a Randomized External Beam Radiotherapy Hypofractionation Trial for Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined, the toxicity and efficacy results for these studies of moderate hypofractionation [16][17][18]20] support the concept of a low α/β ratio and the use of increased hypofractionation (i.e., decreased fraction number with increased dose per fraction). Indeed, in comparison to the above studies, Zelefsky et al [21]delivered conventional fractionation of 81 Gy in 45 fractions with IMRT to 561 patients.…”
Section: The Case For Hypofractionationmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combined, the toxicity and efficacy results for these studies of moderate hypofractionation [16][17][18]20] support the concept of a low α/β ratio and the use of increased hypofractionation (i.e., decreased fraction number with increased dose per fraction). Indeed, in comparison to the above studies, Zelefsky et al [21]delivered conventional fractionation of 81 Gy in 45 fractions with IMRT to 561 patients.…”
Section: The Case For Hypofractionationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Toxicity was not statistically different between the two arms. Most recently, at ASTRO 2011, Pollack et al [18] reported on a randomized trial comparing 76 Gy delivered in 38 fractions to 70.2 Gy delivered in 26 fractions using IMRT. A total of 303 intermediate-and high-risk patients with a median follow-up of more than 60 months for the surviving patients were assessed.…”
Section: The Case For Hypofractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No differences in maximal acute toxicity were seen, but a small increase in acute GI toxicity was noted during treatment. A 5-year update of this work showed no difference in biochemical outcomes [5]. The MD Anderson Cancer Center randomized 204 men to 75.6 Gy in 42 fractions versus 72 Gy in 30 fractions and found no significant difference in 5-year bRFS or toxicity [6].…”
Section: Moderate Hypofractionationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A few large doses of radiation are called "hypofractionation;" delivering treatment in a shorter period of time is called "accelerated" treatment. Three RCTs have been published [10][11][12] and two RCTs presented in abstract 13,14 that confirm hypofractionated accelerated radiation is equally or more effective than standard fractionation radiation. Theoretically, one worries about hypofractionated accelerated radiation causing more toxicity.…”
Section: Evidence Of Biological Dose Escalation In Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%