2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00360-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five year study of astigmatic stability after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation: Comparison of wound sizes

Abstract: Wounds were not necessarily "stable" at 6 months. Larger wounds continued to shift years after surgery. Smaller wounds have significant postoperative advantages, but absolute long-term refractive stability may not be one.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…33 However, the exact amount of SIA is difficult to predict and is reported to depend on the amount of preoperative corneal astigmatism, the incision location and size, suture use, and patient age. [34][35][36] In our study, a temporal 2.2 mm incision induced a significantly lower amount of SIA than a superior 2.2 mm incision (À0.19 G 0.78 D at 7 G 15 degrees versus À0.40 G 0.60 D at 108 G 16 degrees; PZ.034). Previous studies indicate that 2.2 mm temporal incisions induce 0.10 to 0.31 D of SIA 37,38 versus 0.40 D for superior incisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…33 However, the exact amount of SIA is difficult to predict and is reported to depend on the amount of preoperative corneal astigmatism, the incision location and size, suture use, and patient age. [34][35][36] In our study, a temporal 2.2 mm incision induced a significantly lower amount of SIA than a superior 2.2 mm incision (À0.19 G 0.78 D at 7 G 15 degrees versus À0.40 G 0.60 D at 108 G 16 degrees; PZ.034). Previous studies indicate that 2.2 mm temporal incisions induce 0.10 to 0.31 D of SIA 37,38 versus 0.40 D for superior incisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The incision is more than a port of access to the anterior chamber; it represents an important step of the operation, affecting ocular integrity and corneal stability 17. There are several benefits to using a small incision, including more rapid wound healing, less induced corneal distortion, and more control of the anterior chamber during surgery 2,4,7-9. The best incision for cataract surgery ensures no leakage and has minimal influence on corneal shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is believed that a small incision induces less astigmatic change postoperatively 2,7-11. Small incision surgery shows rapid and stable optical recovery by preventing significant changes in corneal curvature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incisions for today's conventional IOLs produce astigmatism of approximately 1.00 D 20-28 ; however, an unsutured clear corneal wound of 2.0 mm is astigmatically neutral. 28 This knowledge has helped fuel the continuing efforts to design an IOL for MICS that can meet the biomechanical challenges of the IOL having an extremely thin optic. The high compressibility and resilience of hydrophilic acrylic materials have made them, so far, a favored choice for this type of IOL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%