2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2003.00572.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Five‐year study on the autumn food habits of the Asiatic black bear in relation to nut production

Abstract: We studied the autumn food habits of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) from 1993 to 1997, based on 202 fecal samples in the Chichibu Mountains, central Japan. Nuts occupied the highest proportions of autumn foods (59.9–85.8% important values). Although the proportion of nuts of Quercus crispula, Fagus crenata and Fagus japonica varied greatly between the years, acorns of Q. crispula were most prevalent in four of the five years. We also determined the relative nut production of these three species by c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural forest conservation and reforestation programmes are likely to have a favourable impact on black bears; however, we found no evidence of range extension for bear populations in the 10 years since the implementation of these programmes and declining bear populations occurred in many areas with good habitat. We suggest two explanations for what appears to be a lack of response of black bears to these conservation initiatives: (1) nut-bearing trees (principally oaks), which are vital for these bears (Reid et al, 1991;Hashimoto et al, 2003), either were not planted (most of the planted trees were coniferous species and Eucalyptus; Ren et al, 2007) or have not reached maturity in the short time since these reforestation programmes were implemented; and (2) poaching continues to threaten bear populations. Poaching for the trade of wildlife parts has caused dramatic declines for many large mammal species, such as tigers (Pantbera tigris; Kenney et al, 1995), rhinos (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural forest conservation and reforestation programmes are likely to have a favourable impact on black bears; however, we found no evidence of range extension for bear populations in the 10 years since the implementation of these programmes and declining bear populations occurred in many areas with good habitat. We suggest two explanations for what appears to be a lack of response of black bears to these conservation initiatives: (1) nut-bearing trees (principally oaks), which are vital for these bears (Reid et al, 1991;Hashimoto et al, 2003), either were not planted (most of the planted trees were coniferous species and Eucalyptus; Ren et al, 2007) or have not reached maturity in the short time since these reforestation programmes were implemented; and (2) poaching continues to threaten bear populations. Poaching for the trade of wildlife parts has caused dramatic declines for many large mammal species, such as tigers (Pantbera tigris; Kenney et al, 1995), rhinos (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also true for bear populations, but see Hashimoto et al (2003) for Asiatic black bears Ursus thibetanus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There are no reports on the feeding behavior of bears that indicating bears select trees depending on the food availability of each tree. However, it is known bears can change their diet and movement behavior frequently depending on fruit production (Hashimoto, 2002;Hashimoto et al, 2003;Koike, 2010;Kozakai et al, 2011;Arimoto et al, in press). Thus bears may select trees based on the difference in fruit production for each individual tree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%