2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-010-0506-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixation and defixation of ammonium in soils: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
153
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(155 reference statements)
8
153
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown in earlier studies that the net N mineralization rate of manure is negatively correlated with the soil clay content (Castellanos and Pratt 1981;Chescheir et al 1986;Sørensen and Jensen 1995a and b). The three main reasons for this phenomenon are (i) fixation of NH 4 + -N into the interlayer spaces of clay minerals (Nieder et al 2011), (ii) entrapment of organic N compounds in soil aggregates inaccessible to microbes and (iii) physical protection of the microbial biomass in the soil structure (Van Veen and Kuikman 1990). According to Magdoff (1978), N mineralization from added organic materials can also be affected by the rate of mineralization of native soil organic matter (OM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in earlier studies that the net N mineralization rate of manure is negatively correlated with the soil clay content (Castellanos and Pratt 1981;Chescheir et al 1986;Sørensen and Jensen 1995a and b). The three main reasons for this phenomenon are (i) fixation of NH 4 + -N into the interlayer spaces of clay minerals (Nieder et al 2011), (ii) entrapment of organic N compounds in soil aggregates inaccessible to microbes and (iii) physical protection of the microbial biomass in the soil structure (Van Veen and Kuikman 1990). According to Magdoff (1978), N mineralization from added organic materials can also be affected by the rate of mineralization of native soil organic matter (OM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the Alfisol exhibited a higher liberation of residual N to the crop compared with the Vertisol, which is associated to the type of clay prevailing in both soils (Nieder et al, 2010) and the dynamics of N in each soil in the presence of plants where the delivery capacity of soil N could be higher than the result generated by an analysis of available N prior to crop establishment as pointed out by Fernández (1995) and Hirzel et al (2007) for maize in the absence of fertilization. compared with the control without N. Crop N uptake as a residual effect of applied N was between 29.3 and 33.9 kg N ha -1 in Alfisol and 28.3 and 45.8 kg N ha -1 in Vertisol compared with the control in both cases, no significant difference existed that corroborates significance between their means (P > 0.05).…”
Section: Correlation Of Soil N Mineralization Indexes With N Uptake Bmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Mean mineralized N-NH4 + concentration in the Vertisol was 54.15 mg kg -1 at 160 kg N ha -1 rate applied in the previous season for 21 d incubation (Figure 1b). The differences in the amount of mineralized N in both soils respond to higher N uptake of the previous season in Vertisol (Hirzel and Rodríguez, 2013) and to the dynamics of N-NH4 + adsorption and desorption in the dominant type of clay (Montmorillonite) in the Vertisol under incubation conditions (Nieder et al, 2010), which in turn is mediated by soil biomass (Jensen et al, 2000;Sainz et al, 2004;Sahrawat, 2006) as well as the degree of K saturation (Table 1) in the intermediate layers of clay minerals (Nieder et al, 2010). The submerged condition of rice paddy soils is also a factor that influences the level of soil N-NH4 + mineralization; however, it can lead to contradictory conclusions about the extent of mineralization.…”
Section: Anaerobic Incubations On Soil N Mineralization Mineralizatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when K + was applied after ammonium containing fertilizers total yield was significantly higher with K1. Although continuous uptake of K + ions reduced the K + concentration and diminished the blocking effect on the release of NH 4 + (Nieder et al 2011) the K + concentration in the treatments with K2 was still too high to overcome the blocking effect. Therefore the statement of Pasda et al (2001) that N fertilizers combined with DMPP may improve yields of agricultural crops and vegetables must be observed in more details.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If the K + concentration of the soil solution is high or increased by K fertilizer application, it can be expected that the interlayer space is also saturated with K + (Scherer 1982), resulting in a decreased NH 4 + fixation. Otherwise K + may impede the release of NH 4 + ions, which may be due to the blocking effect of K + ions (Nieder et al 2011). Therefore, when applying NH 4 + stabilized fertilizers interactions between NH 4 + and K + ions should be taken into consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%