2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00391.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed- and Variable-Rate Mortgages, Business Cycles, and Monetary Policy

Abstract: The aim of this paper is twofold. First, I study how the proportion of …xed and variable-rate mortgages in an economy can a¤ect the way shocks are propagated. Second, I analyze optimal implementable simple monetary policy rules and the welfare implications of this proportion. I develop and solve a New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model that features a housing market and a group of constrained individuals who need housing collateral to obtain loans. A given proportion of constrained househol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most existing business cycle models with housing assume one‐period loans. The interest rate applied to the loan is either the current short‐term interest rate (e.g., Iacoviello, , and many others), a weighted average of the current and past interest rates (Rubio, ), or evolving in a sticky Calvo‐style fashion (Graham and Wright, ). The loan in Iacoviello () is equivalent to δDt=1 for all t , whereas the loans in Rubio () and Graham and Wright () are equivalent to δDt=1 for all t in Equation , but not in Equation .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing business cycle models with housing assume one‐period loans. The interest rate applied to the loan is either the current short‐term interest rate (e.g., Iacoviello, , and many others), a weighted average of the current and past interest rates (Rubio, ), or evolving in a sticky Calvo‐style fashion (Graham and Wright, ). The loan in Iacoviello () is equivalent to δDt=1 for all t , whereas the loans in Rubio () and Graham and Wright () are equivalent to δDt=1 for all t in Equation , but not in Equation .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly the case with housing demand and LTV shocks, but not, for instance, with total factor productivity (TFP) shocks, which leads us to exclude the latter from our experiments. Importantly and different from previous studies (see, e.g., Rubio ) we do not consider cost‐push shocks either. The latter are known to be a source of policy trade‐off in a standard New Keynesian model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The welfare measure is computed by augmenting the model structure with the following equations: truerightscriptWtjleftE0t=0(βj)t{11σXtj1σ11+ϕCNC,tj1+ϕCrightleft11+ϕHNH,tj1+ϕH}for j=s,b, which in recursive form read: scriptWtj=UXtj,NC,tj,NH,tj+βjEtscriptWt+1j.Because of agents' heterogeneity, individual welfare functions must be aggregated into a social welfare function. We follow Lambertini, Mendicino, and Punzi (), Mendicino and Pescatori (), and Rubio () and define the social welfare function as a weighted average of individual welfare as follows: scriptWtφsscriptWts+φbscriptWtb,where φs=(1ω)(1βs) and φb=ω(1βb), so that given a constant stream of final consumption X , the two agents receive the same level of utility. In the following, we fo...…”
Section: Welfare Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 We set = 2, implying a value of the labor supply elasticity of 1: 27 Following Horvath (2000) and Iacoviello and Neri (2010), we set the inverse elasticity of substitution across hours in the two sectors to one:For the loan-to-value ratio we consider a steady-state value of 0.67 and 0.80, for the Euro area and Spain, respectively, taking the average LTV ratio observed in the data. 28 The labor-income share of unconstrained consumers, , is set to 0:7. 29 We pick a value of 6…”
Section: Parameter Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%