Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: What are the differences?

Abstract

For analyses of longitudinal repeated-measures data, statistical methods include the random effects model, fixed effects model and the method of generalized estimating equations. We examine the assumptions that underlie these approaches to assessing covariate effects on the mean of a continuous, dichotomous or count outcome. Access to statistical software to implement these models has led to widespread application in numerous disciplines. However, careful consideration should be paid to their critical assumptions to ascertain which model might be appropriate in a given setting. To illustrate similarities and differences that might exist in empirical results, we use a study that assessed depressive symptoms in low-income pregnant women using a structured instrument with up to five assessments that spanned the pre-natal and post-natal periods. Understanding the conceptual differences between the methods is important in their proper application even though empirically they might not differ substantively. The choice of model in specific applications would depend on the relevant questions being addressed, which in turn informs the type of design and data collection that would be relevant.

Reliability of Therapist Effects in Practice-Based Psychotherapy Research: A Guide for the Planning of Future Studies

“…However, in regard to the research question, multilevel modeling on the basis of maximum-likelihood estimations which focuses on the partition of variance associated with each level seemed to be the appropriate method (e.g. Burton, 1998;Gardiner et al, 2009). Furthermore, it is the most common approach for analyzing TEs (Baldwin & Imel, 2103).…”

Investigating the Role of Salivary Cortisol on Vocal Symptoms

“…The Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method is an extension to the Generalized Linear Model to data with an unknown correlation structure between the measurements, making it possible to include all siblings and twins from a family in the analyses (Hanley, Negassa, Edwardes, & Forrester, 2003). The robust variance estimator in combination with the GEE is fairly robust in yielding consistent and asymptotically normally distributed parameter estimates, also in cases where the working correlation matrix is misspecified (Gardiner, Luo & Roman, 2009). …”

Cash flow management and manufacturing firm financial performance: A longitudinal perspective

“…Analyses of repeated-measures panel data samples typically utilize either subject-specific techniques such as randomeffects modeling and fixed-effects modeling or population-averaged techniques such as generalized estimating equations (GEEs) (Gardiner et al, 2009). Each of these methods offers particular advantages that depend on the nature of the data sample and the desired research focus (Hu et al, 1998).…”