1995
DOI: 10.1006/jmaa.1995.1194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed Points of Generalized Contractive Multi-valued Mappings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the sequence {d(y 2k+1 ,y 2k )} is monotone nonincreasing. Then, as in the proof of Theorem 2.1 in [2], {y n } is a Cauchy sequence in X. Further, equation (2.2) ensures that {A n } is a Cauchy sequence in CB(X).…”
Section: T X ∈ Cb(x) and H(f T X T F X) ≤ D(f X T X)mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the sequence {d(y 2k+1 ,y 2k )} is monotone nonincreasing. Then, as in the proof of Theorem 2.1 in [2], {y n } is a Cauchy sequence in X. Further, equation (2.2) ensures that {A n } is a Cauchy sequence in CB(X).…”
Section: T X ∈ Cb(x) and H(f T X T F X) ≤ D(f X T X)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Recently Daffer and Kaneko [2] reaffirmed the positive answer [5] to the conjecture of Reich [8] by giving an alternative proof to Theorem 5 of Mizoguchi and Takahashi [5]. We state Theorem 2.1 of Daffer and Kaneko [2] for convenience.…”
Section: T X ∈ Cb(x) and H(f T X T F X) ≤ D(f X T X)mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically the question is whether or not the range of T , K(X), can be replaced by CB(X). In response to Reich's conjecture, the following theorem was recently proved by Mizoguchi and Takahashi [4], and other proofs have been given by Daffer and Kaneko [3] and Tong-Huei Chang [2].…”
Section: ] Reich Proved That a Mapping T : X → K(x) Has A Fixed Poinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1995, Daffer [5] provided an alternative and somewhat more straightforward proof of Theorem 1.2. In 2006, Feng and Liu [7] obtained an interesting generalization of Theorem 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%