2002
DOI: 10.1090/conm/296/05077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed subgroups in free groups: a survey

Abstract: Abstract. This note is a survey of the main results known about fixed subgroups of endomorphisms of finitely generated free groups. A historic point of view is taken, emphasizing the evolution of this line of research, from its beginning to the present time. The article concludes with a section containing the main open problems and conjectures, with some comments and discussions on them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that H is compressed if rk(H) ≤ rk(K) for every K ≤ F containing H (see Section 3.4), and say that H is inert if rk(H ∩K) ≤ rk(K) for every K ≤ F . Both these properties were introduced by Dicks and Ventura [5] in the context of the study of subgroups of free groups that are fixed by sets of endomorphisms or automorphisms (see also [21]). …”
Section: Proposition 46 Let H ≤ F (A) Be An Extension Of Finitely Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that H is compressed if rk(H) ≤ rk(K) for every K ≤ F containing H (see Section 3.4), and say that H is inert if rk(H ∩K) ≤ rk(K) for every K ≤ F . Both these properties were introduced by Dicks and Ventura [5] in the context of the study of subgroups of free groups that are fixed by sets of endomorphisms or automorphisms (see also [21]). …”
Section: Proposition 46 Let H ≤ F (A) Be An Extension Of Finitely Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldstein and Turner extended it to monomorphisms of free groups [11], and later to arbitrary endomorphisms [12]. Collins and Turner extended it to automorphisms of free products of freely indecomposable groups [3] (see the survey by Ventura [22]). With respect to automorphisms, the widest generalization is to hyperbolic groups and is due to Paulin [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) In [5], the previous result was generalised to say that every 1-mono-ÿxed subgroup H of F is F-inert, i.e. r(H ∩ K) 6 r(K) for every K 6 F. Inertia for 1-endo-ÿxed subgroups is an open problem (see [1,17,13] for related results).…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%