2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-021-0097-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixed-time Disturbance Observer-based Sliding Mode Control for Mismatched Uncertain Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] addresses this situation by providing a rigorous finite‐time stability analysis that proves the system variables and states will not escape to infinity during the convergence process of the estimation. Similar results have been reported in [16, 23–26]. Furthermore, [27] not only proves the upper bound of system states during the estimation process but also proposes a new approach for designing a switched hybrid control strategy based on a fixed‐time DOB.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1] addresses this situation by providing a rigorous finite‐time stability analysis that proves the system variables and states will not escape to infinity during the convergence process of the estimation. Similar results have been reported in [16, 23–26]. Furthermore, [27] not only proves the upper bound of system states during the estimation process but also proposes a new approach for designing a switched hybrid control strategy based on a fixed‐time DOB.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is worth noting that the conventional linear SMC cannot handle mismatched terms. To address this issue, various improvements have been proposed, such as LMI-based SMC [14] and adaptive SMC [15], while the above-mentioned modified SMC schemes require that the mismatched disturbances satisfy the H 2 norm-bounded assumption, which is unreasonable since the mismatched disturbances always belong to nonvanishing uncertainties [16]. In recent years, DOB-based SMC strategies have been proposed to suppress mismatched disturbances, relax the unreasonable H 2 norm-bounded assumption, and maintain the nominal robust performance of SMC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are six-degrees of freedom (out of which three describe translational motion and three describe rotational motion) while the drone's dynamic model receives only four control inputs (a lift force and three torques which define the turn angles of the quadropter) [42][43]. The complete 6-DOF dynamic model of the quadrotor is a highly nonlinear one and its control is usually performed with (i) global linearization control methods [44][45], (ii) local linearization control methods [46][47][48] and (iii) Lyapunov analysis-based methods [49][50][51]. The present article demonstrates solution of the nonlinear control problem of 6-DOF unmanned quadrotors with the use of flatness-based control implemented in successive loops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a series of SMC with finite-time/fixed-time convergence have been introduced along with the expansion of FnTCM and FxTCM theory, such as Integral SMC (ISMC) [ 26 , 27 ], Terminal SMC (TSMC) [ 28 , 29 ], Non-singular TSMC (NTSMC) [ 30 , 31 ], Fast TSMC (FTSMC) [ 29 , 32 , 33 ], Fast NTSMC (FNTSMC) [ 34 , 35 ], and so on. Therefore, the Finite-Time Disturbance Observers (FnTDOs) or Fixed-Time Disturbance Observers (FxTDOs) have been developed such as Second-Order Sliding Mode Observer (SOSMO) [ 16 , 36 ], Uniform SOSMO (USOSMO) [ 37 , 38 ], or Third-Order Sliding Mode Observer (TOSMO) [ 14 , 39 , 40 ]. It can be seen from a comparison between FnTDO and FxTDO that under the same observer’s gains, FnTDO cannot achieve a similar fast convergence performance as FxTDO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%