2019
DOI: 10.1177/2514848619826576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest

Abstract: Conservation-development projects are increasingly enacted across large expanses of land where human livelihoods hang in the balance. Recent initiatives-often called 'landscape approaches' or 'ecosystem-based' conservation-aim to achieve economic development and conservation goals through managing hybrid spaces. I argue that the landscape/ecosystem approach is a socioecological fix: an effort to resolve social-environmental crises through sinking capital (financial, natural, and social) into an imagined ecosys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because during and after the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, there was a shortage of lands to resettle returnees and internally displaced people. Consequently, forests were encroached for anthropogenic activities agriculture and resulted in considerable loss of forestland (Clay 2019;Uwemeye et al 2020). NISR (2018) also reported a considerable change in LULC occurred in Rwanda between 1990 and 2000 due war and instability, and as a consequence, anthropogenic activities started taking place in natural forests.…”
Section: Lulc Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because during and after the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, there was a shortage of lands to resettle returnees and internally displaced people. Consequently, forests were encroached for anthropogenic activities agriculture and resulted in considerable loss of forestland (Clay 2019;Uwemeye et al 2020). NISR (2018) also reported a considerable change in LULC occurred in Rwanda between 1990 and 2000 due war and instability, and as a consequence, anthropogenic activities started taking place in natural forests.…”
Section: Lulc Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Led by a narrative of growing bodies to grow nations (specifically an expanding urban middle class) following World War II, agricultural research and policy created the preconditions for dairy farms in the North to specialize and intensify ( Smith-Howard, 2014 ). Often through colonial and neo-colonial pathways, similar institutions emphasized technology-led productivity increases in Africa, Latin America, and Asia ( Clay, 2019 ; Wiley, 2014 ). Since the 1950s, milk output in the North has increased exponentially per farm, per cow, and per input of feed and labor.…”
Section: The Contested Past and Future Of Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Africa, such programs have been shown to overlook gender dynamics and the multiple objectives of different actors in dairy value chains ( Salmon et al, 2018 ; Taverner & Crane, 2018 ). Adherence to a regime of “more milk” (e.g., establishing pasture, importing European cattle breeds, and charging a fee for access) can enable urban elites to benefit while dispossessing subsistence users from pasture access ( Clay, 2019 ).…”
Section: Assessing Milk Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work further demonstrates that socioecological fixes are often initiated to counter or alleviate environmental degradation, biodiversity loss or fossil fuel consumption (amongst others), but in reality exacerbate pre-existing inequalities, power asymmetries and unsustainable practices (Clay, 2019). In this way, a third connotation to 'fix' important in the chapter emerges, namely that of 'fixing a problem' or, more specifically, a 'quick-fix' that seems to respond to a problem but does not actually engage its root causes.…”
Section: Socioecological Conservation Fixes and Spatial (In)justicementioning
confidence: 72%