2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8852390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FKIMNet: A Finger Dorsal Image Matching Network Comparing Component (Major, Minor and Nail) Matching with Holistic (Finger Dorsal) Matching

Abstract: Current finger knuckle image recognition systems, often require users to place fingers' major or minor joints flatly towards the capturing sensor. To extend these systems for user non-intrusive application scenarios, such as consumer electronics, forensic, defence etc, we suggest matching the full dorsal fingers, rather than the major/ minor region of interest (ROI) alone. In particular, this paper makes a comprehensive study on the comparisons between full finger and fusion of finger ROI's for finger knuckle … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Curve ROC for all sum score level fusion achieved highest recognition rate (rank-1) compared to scheme designed in Zeinali et al (2014). In addition, the presented system in this study achieved 99.65% of rank-1, which is better than FKIMNet proposed in Thapar et al (2019). It can also be noted that work in Chlaoua et al (2019) achieved the highest recognition rate 100% for all fingers, but if we observe for two fingers (e.g., LIF-RIF or LIF-LMF) the proposed system reached a good performance.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Studies On Fkpmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 Curve ROC for all sum score level fusion achieved highest recognition rate (rank-1) compared to scheme designed in Zeinali et al (2014). In addition, the presented system in this study achieved 99.65% of rank-1, which is better than FKIMNet proposed in Thapar et al (2019). It can also be noted that work in Chlaoua et al (2019) achieved the highest recognition rate 100% for all fingers, but if we observe for two fingers (e.g., LIF-RIF or LIF-LMF) the proposed system reached a good performance.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Studies On Fkpmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We can notice in Table 9 that the proposed system under verification mode attained lowest EER that is 0.19%. compared to EER by systems in Jaswal et al (2017b) and Thapar et al (2019) for all fingers. In identification mode, for the modalities (LIF-RIF), (LIF-LMF) and all finger the proposed system Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Studies On Fkpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In future work, we would like to create an end‐to‐end deep learning iris‐based recognition system. Such a system would consist of three modules, (i) PixISegNet for pixel‐level segmentation (occlusion exclusion), (ii) an encoder–decoder model for quality assessment and enhancement of the images [50] and finally (iii) a Siamese‐based matching network [49]. Since the individual modules not only learn to optimise their task but also learn to provide an output that optimises the final recognition problem, making our network more generalised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, contactless acquisition‐based palm or knuckle recognition algorithms are quite challenging, which can improve their user‐friendliness and scope in a variety of security applications. Also, the efforts have been made on cross spectral image matching, liveness detection, and employing deep convolution neural network‐based end to end biometric systems to improve the matching performance (Jaswal, Nath, et al, 2017; Thapar, Jaswal, & Nigam, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%