2001
DOI: 10.1078/0932-4739-00822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flabelliforma montana (Phylum Microsporidia) from Phlebotomus ariasi (Diptera, Psychodidae): ultrastructural observations and phylogenetic relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…magnivora continues to be problematic and may require revision. Canning et al (2001) first reported that this microsporidium should not be placed within the genus Flabelliforma, and our analysis concurs by showing a 28% nucleotide difference (based on our alignment) from the type species, F. montana. Morris and Freeman (2010) suggested placing F. magnavora in the newly erected genus Neoflabelliforma along with the type species N. aurentiae based on developmental and phylogenetic similarities, but did note differences in spore morphology (size, shape and length of the polar filament).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…magnivora continues to be problematic and may require revision. Canning et al (2001) first reported that this microsporidium should not be placed within the genus Flabelliforma, and our analysis concurs by showing a 28% nucleotide difference (based on our alignment) from the type species, F. montana. Morris and Freeman (2010) suggested placing F. magnavora in the newly erected genus Neoflabelliforma along with the type species N. aurentiae based on developmental and phylogenetic similarities, but did note differences in spore morphology (size, shape and length of the polar filament).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The placement of F. magnivora within the genus Flabelliforma has been questioned. Based on molecular data, Canning et al (2001) showed that F. magnivora was not closely related to the type species, Flabelliforma montana a parasite of the sandfly Phlebotomus ariasi, and suggested that the former species should not be placed in the genus. Morris and Freeman (2010) most recently reported ultrastructural and phylogenetic similarities between F. magnivora and a microsporidium, Neoflabelliforma aurantiae n. gen., n. sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our study revealed 22 novel microsporidian species and only four described species: O. operophterae (host: beetle) (Canning et al. , ), S. perivermis (host: marine nematode) (Ardila‐Garcia and Fast ), O. muscadomesticae (host: fly) (Vossbrinck et al. ), and N. aurantiae (host: Myxosporidia and Oligochaeta) (Morris and Freeman ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…) and O. operopterae (host: moth) (Canning et al. , ), respectively. UBN_Seattle3 showed high similarity (96% identity) to a named microsporidium, the hyperparasitic N. aurantiae (hosts: Myxozoa and Oligacheata) (Morris and Freeman ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite vast data on small subunit (SSU) ribosomal gene (rDNA) sequences of various microsporidia (Baker et al 1995;Canning et al 2001Canning et al , 2002Hester et al 2000;Morris, Terry, and Adams 2005), no molecular data are available yet for establishing phylogenetic relationships of those infecting ciliates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%