2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flag manifold sigma models

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 242 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of phenomena induced by coupling between fermions and such CP 2 Skyrmions is of great importance. Another interesting direction is the generalization to the sigma model on the flag manifold SU(N )/U(1) N −1 [24,25,26,27]. The second homotopy group of the flag manifold is not Z but Z N −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of phenomena induced by coupling between fermions and such CP 2 Skyrmions is of great importance. Another interesting direction is the generalization to the sigma model on the flag manifold SU(N )/U(1) N −1 [24,25,26,27]. The second homotopy group of the flag manifold is not Z but Z N −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinct scalar fields take thus value in the manifold U(3)/U(1) 3 ∼ SU(3)/U(1) 2 , which is the flag manifold. 88 The next step of the approach is to replace the identification (C4) into the action (C2) to derive the low-energy effective field theory for the complex fields Φ i . The action…”
Section: Sign Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we find for the log divergent part of (6.9) (we assume τ > 0) 35 34 We explicitly extracted the 1 R 2 prefactor which is due to the normalization of χ r ≡ η r in (6.4); ηr (τ )η s (0) = δ rs D(τ). 35 Note that here the UV scale Λ enters only together with τ so that there are no IR divergences.…”
Section: One-loop 1/r 2 Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an example of representing the trace in some representation in terms of an integral over group orbit[32], cf also[33,34] for a more general discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%