2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-017-0422-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flag-transitive point-primitive automorphism groups of non-symmetric 2-(v, k, 3) designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 2.2 (Liang and Zhou [9,10]). Let  be a nontrivial nonsymmetric 2-v k λ ( , , ) design with ∈ λ {2, 3}, and G be a primitive flag-transitive automorphism group of .…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proposition 2.2 (Liang and Zhou [9,10]). Let  be a nontrivial nonsymmetric 2-v k λ ( , , ) design with ∈ λ {2, 3}, and G be a primitive flag-transitive automorphism group of .…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that T is a simple group of Lie type over the field q . Then ≥ p T q ( ) except for T = PSL (9) 2 with p T ( ) = 6. In particular, p T ( ) =…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A natural problem is whether every nonsymmetric design satisfies the reduction theorem? In fact, Liang and Zhou in [7,8] obtained the same result, that is to say, if λ3 and MJX-tex-caligraphicscriptD is nonsymmetric, then G must be of affine or almost simple type. Furthermore, it is proved in [7] that there are exactly two nontrivial nonsymmetric 2‐(v,k,2) designs admitting a flag‐transitive point‐primitive automorphism group G with alternating socle An (n5): one is a 2‐(6,3,2) design with G=A5, another is a 2‐(10,4,2) design with G=A5,A6, or S6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%