1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-2180(96)00127-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame and droplet interaction effects during droplet-stream combustion at zero reynolds number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deviations of less than 1% between numerical and analytical results for the droplet mass vaporization rate and flame stand-off distance were obtained. Besides, these analytical solutions were used to calibrate the clustering parameter (c*) introduced by the coordinate transformations (Leiroz and Rangel, 1997). Typical value used was c* = 1.01.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Deviations of less than 1% between numerical and analytical results for the droplet mass vaporization rate and flame stand-off distance were obtained. Besides, these analytical solutions were used to calibrate the clustering parameter (c*) introduced by the coordinate transformations (Leiroz and Rangel, 1997). Typical value used was c* = 1.01.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transient term is discretized using a forward first-order scheme. The resulting forward-time centeredspace (FTCS) scheme (Roache, 1972) leads to a system of algebraic equations with the same matrix structure as in the quasi-steady case (Leiroz and Rangel, 1995;Leiroz and Rangel, 1997). Therefore, the iterative procedure used for quasi-steady simulations (Leiroz and Rangel, 1997) remains appropriate for each transient calculation time step.…”
Section: Numerical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations