2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01117-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame photometric detector for thin-layer chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of each subcellular fraction was judged by standard enzymatic measurements, cytochrome c oxidase (mitochondrial marker), NADPH‐cytochrome c reductase (microsomal marker), and lactate dehydrogenase (cytosolic marker) as reported previously 11. The cell constituents were extracted with chloroform and methanol (2:1 by volume), and lipids in the chloroform layer were analyzed by using a thin‐layer chromatography equipped with a flame ionization detection system 12. The total molar lipid content of each cell fraction was determined using these authentic samples and average molecular weight as follows: for phosphatidylcholine, 1,2‐dimyristoyl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 677.9; for phosphatidylethanolamine, l‐α‐phosphatidylethanolamine from egg yolk (Sigma) and 746.1; for triacylglycerol, triolein (Nacalai, Kyoto, Japan) and 885.4; for cholesterol, cholesterol (Sigma) and 386.7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of each subcellular fraction was judged by standard enzymatic measurements, cytochrome c oxidase (mitochondrial marker), NADPH‐cytochrome c reductase (microsomal marker), and lactate dehydrogenase (cytosolic marker) as reported previously 11. The cell constituents were extracted with chloroform and methanol (2:1 by volume), and lipids in the chloroform layer were analyzed by using a thin‐layer chromatography equipped with a flame ionization detection system 12. The total molar lipid content of each cell fraction was determined using these authentic samples and average molecular weight as follows: for phosphatidylcholine, 1,2‐dimyristoyl‐rac‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 677.9; for phosphatidylethanolamine, l‐α‐phosphatidylethanolamine from egg yolk (Sigma) and 746.1; for triacylglycerol, triolein (Nacalai, Kyoto, Japan) and 885.4; for cholesterol, cholesterol (Sigma) and 386.7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell constituents were extracted with chloroform and methanol (1:5:10, v/v), and lipids in the chloroform layer were analyzed by using a thin-layer chromatography equipped with a flame ionization detection system [24]. The total molar lipid content of each cell fraction was determined using these authentic samples and average molecular weight as follows: for phosphatidylcholine, 1,2-dimyristoyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine (Sigma) and 677.9; for phosphatidylethanolamine, L-α-phosphatidylethanolamine from egg yolk (Sigma) and 746.1; for triacylglycerol, triolein (Nacalai) and 885.4; for cholesterol, cholesterol (Sigma) and 386.7.…”
Section: Determination Of Intracellular Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equipment typically used in the bituminous materials industry to perform the TLC is IATROSCAN (Ogasawa et al 2002). It can be equipped in the flame ionization detector (FID) or with Flame Photometric Detector (FPD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be equipped in the flame ionization detector (FID) or with Flame Photometric Detector (FPD). The FPD is in principle an FID, extended by a filter and a photomultiplier tube (Ogasawa et al 2002). Due to the increasing interest in sulfur (S) distribution in bituminous fractions and their effect on bitumen properties (Makowska et al 2017;McKenna et al 2013) the FPD with a filter at 394 nm wavelength is explored (S-FPD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%