2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-006-9061-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flame-Retardancy Improvement of Novel Styrene–Maleic Anhydride Based Copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As well known, the thermal stability of polystyrene could be greatly improved by copolymerization with maleic anhydride (MA) 9. Styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) copolymers are commonly industrial materials due to their water‐solublity, high functionality, low‐solution viscosity, and water insensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well known, the thermal stability of polystyrene could be greatly improved by copolymerization with maleic anhydride (MA) 9. Styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) copolymers are commonly industrial materials due to their water‐solublity, high functionality, low‐solution viscosity, and water insensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TGA analysis of SMA‐ESO polymer shows mainly the characteristics of its building blocks which are ESO and SMA since the TGA analysis results of ESO and SMA are almost identical. TGA analysis of SMA‐MR shows weight loss between 200 and 300°C which probably corresponds to the loss of MR. Another weight loss is observed between 300 and 400°C, probably corresponding to SMA decomposition temperature 23, 24, 25. At the end of TGA analysis SMA‐MR gives 18.93% char yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, the slight decrease in T m recorded by increasing Sb 2 O 3 content may be accounted for two morphological effects (a decrease in lamellar thickness) and the thermodynamic factors (polymer–polymer interactions). The macromolecular chain motion was apparently restricted due to physical bonding interactions of filler molecules with substrate backbone 19…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%